Marriage–housing as intimate infrastructure: vital conjunctures in urban Chongqing, China

Across urban China and other settings where property is tethered to marriageability, access to housing has become a key condition for union formation and family timing. We reconceptualise marriage–housing (婚房, hunfang) as intimate infrastructure organised through vital conjunctures—socially structured zones of possibility in which obligations, debt, hukou, and gendered moralities are negotiated under uncertainty. Drawing on 45 semi-structured interviews and participant observation at Chongqing’s People’s Park matchmaking corner, we trace how futures are made and unmade under overlapping constraints. We identify four conjunctural mechanisms: conditional marriageability tied to homeownership; refusal of patrilocal co-residence and strategic delay by women seeking post-marital autonomy; intergenerational bargaining and asset reallocation across kin; and affective withdrawal and non-marriage as default under prolonged insecurity. These mechanisms re-pattern life course timing and couple-level expectations through mortgage stretch and debt duration, peri-urban new build purchase and commute tradeoffs, and public rental housing (PRH) as a holding pattern. Conceptually, we integrate relational and moral geographies with the vital conjunctures lens to foreground uncertainty, indecision, and “absent possibilities” in housing–marriage trajectories. Rather than treating marriage–housing as a singular market driver, we specify articulations between intimate infrastructures and land–finance arrangements that vary by place, cohort, and policy, and outline implications for secure rental, PRH design, and support for intergenerationally entangled households.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-01-21
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marriage–housing as intimate infrastructure: vital conjunctures in urban Chongqing, China

Deljana Iossifova, Weijie Hu
Research Portal (King's College London)
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Marriage–housing as intimate infrastructure: vital conjunctures in urban Chongqing, China

Deljana Iossifova, Weijie Hu
article en

Abstract

Across urban China and other settings where property is tethered to marriageability, access to housing has become a key condition for union formation and family timing. We reconceptualise marriage–housing (婚房, hunfang) as intimate infrastructure organised through vital conjunctures—socially structured zones of possibility in which obligations, debt, hukou, and gendered moralities are negotiated under uncertainty. Drawing on 45 semi-structured interviews and participant observation at Chongqing’s People’s Park matchmaking corner, we trace how futures are made and unmade under overlapping constraints. We identify four conjunctural mechanisms: conditional marriageability tied to homeownership; refusal of patrilocal co-residence and strategic delay by women seeking post-marital autonomy; intergenerational bargaining and asset reallocation across kin; and affective withdrawal and non-marriage as default under prolonged insecurity. These mechanisms re-pattern life course timing and couple-level expectations through mortgage stretch and debt duration, peri-urban new build purchase and commute tradeoffs, and public rental housing (PRH) as a holding pattern. Conceptually, we integrate relational and moral geographies with the vital conjunctures lens to foreground uncertainty, indecision, and “absent possibilities” in housing–marriage trajectories. Rather than treating marriage–housing as a singular market driver, we specify articulations between intimate infrastructures and land–finance arrangements that vary by place, cohort, and policy, and outline implications for secure rental, PRH design, and support for intergenerationally entangled households.

Research Portal (King's College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.