Measuring Risk of Re-identification for a Nonprobability Sample Using a General Reference Sample

Estimating the risk of re-identification probabilistically is well-developed for the case of a random representative sample drawn from the general population, such as large-scale government surveys conducted regularly at National Statistical Institutes. Recent work extended this procedure to assess the risk of re-identification in non-probability subpopulation registers such as a cancer register. In this paper, we extend this work further to the case of samples drawn from registers or more generally to non-probability samples, such as those used in opt-in panels at survey organizations. The assumption is that membership to the subpopulation register is not known and the sampling mechanism is also unknown. We show how to assess the risk of re-identification for these types of non-probability samples using a probability-based reference sample to infer population parameters under the probabilistic modelling framework. We demonstrate with a simulation study and a real application on the 2021 Survey of Doctoral Recipients drawn from a subpopulation register of all PhD recipients from an accredited US institution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2026-01-14
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Risk of Re-identification for a Nonprobability Sample Using a General Reference Sample

Minsun Riddles, Tom Krenzke
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Measuring Risk of Re-identification for a Nonprobability Sample Using a General Reference Sample

Minsun Riddles, Tom Krenzke
article en

Abstract

Estimating the risk of re-identification probabilistically is well-developed for the case of a random representative sample drawn from the general population, such as large-scale government surveys conducted regularly at National Statistical Institutes. Recent work extended this procedure to assess the risk of re-identification in non-probability subpopulation registers such as a cancer register. In this paper, we extend this work further to the case of samples drawn from registers or more generally to non-probability samples, such as those used in opt-in panels at survey organizations. The assumption is that membership to the subpopulation register is not known and the sampling mechanism is also unknown. We show how to assess the risk of re-identification for these types of non-probability samples using a probability-based reference sample to infer population parameters under the probabilistic modelling framework. We demonstrate with a simulation study and a real application on the 2021 Survey of Doctoral Recipients drawn from a subpopulation register of all PhD recipients from an accredited US institution.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.