Unspeakable and Unspoken: Gender Inequalities in the Labor Experience of Female Social Scientists in Chile

The article discusses the results of a qualitative study on how gender inequality is experienced by female social scientists in their relationship with their male colleagues and/or authorities in Chilean universities. It aims to establish a typology of the axes in which these inequalities are manifested and/or reproduced. After synthesizing an overview of the studies and statistics on gender inequalities in Chilean academia, we present the qualitative methodology of the study, based on the in-depth interviews with fifty women working as researchers and/or professors at twelve universities in nine cities of the north, center, and south of Chile. Then, we delve into the qualitative analysis and discuss the three axes of gender inequality identified in the women’s accounts and their intersectional dimensions: (i) the salary gaps and work overload of women compared to men; (ii) the little recognition of women’s skills and careers; and (iii) the assumption that research and leadership are masculine areas. In the final remarks, we summarize the conclusions of the study, addressing how the multidimensional and multifaceted nature of sexist experiences in university environments generates a relational “atmosphere” in which the boundary between inequalities and violence is blurred.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Conicet
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unspeakable and Unspoken: Gender Inequalities in the Labor Experience of Female Social Scientists in Chile

Menara Lube Guizardi, Carolina Stefoni, Isabel Araya
Conicet
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Unspeakable and Unspoken: Gender Inequalities in the Labor Experience of Female Social Scientists in Chile

Menara Lube Guizardi, Carolina Stefoni, Isabel Araya
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the results of a qualitative study on how gender inequality is experienced by female social scientists in their relationship with their male colleagues and/or authorities in Chilean universities. It aims to establish a typology of the axes in which these inequalities are manifested and/or reproduced. After synthesizing an overview of the studies and statistics on gender inequalities in Chilean academia, we present the qualitative methodology of the study, based on the in-depth interviews with fifty women working as researchers and/or professors at twelve universities in nine cities of the north, center, and south of Chile. Then, we delve into the qualitative analysis and discuss the three axes of gender inequality identified in the women’s accounts and their intersectional dimensions: (i) the salary gaps and work overload of women compared to men; (ii) the little recognition of women’s skills and careers; and (iii) the assumption that research and leadership are masculine areas. In the final remarks, we summarize the conclusions of the study, addressing how the multidimensional and multifaceted nature of sexist experiences in university environments generates a relational “atmosphere” in which the boundary between inequalities and violence is blurred.

Conicet
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.