Art as response : The dialogical relationship between graffiti writing and graffiti removal

While graffiti can be understood as an artistic response to a variety of issues (encompassing norms related to the use of public space, inclusive of the perceived need to remove graffiti), removal (also known as buffing) can be seen both as an act of erasure in response to graffiti writing and as a creative, if often unintentionally so, endeavour with its own styles and aesthetic qualities. In recent years, this has led a growing number of theorists and graffiti enthusiasts to suggest that buffing, much like graffiti, should be considered a form of art. At the same time, the practice of graffiti removal remains a manifestation of political and normative values and ideas about who can legitimately make their mark on surfaces in public space. With a point of departure in several empirical cases, this chapter considers aspects of the visual dialogues between graffiti writers and graffiti cleaners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Public Spaces through Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Art as response : The dialogical relationship between graffiti writing and graffiti removal

Peter Bengtsen
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Public Spaces through Art
article

Art as response : The dialogical relationship between graffiti writing and graffiti removal

Peter Bengtsen
article en

Abstract

While graffiti can be understood as an artistic response to a variety of issues (encompassing norms related to the use of public space, inclusive of the perceived need to remove graffiti), removal (also known as buffing) can be seen both as an act of erasure in response to graffiti writing and as a creative, if often unintentionally so, endeavour with its own styles and aesthetic qualities. In recent years, this has led a growing number of theorists and graffiti enthusiasts to suggest that buffing, much like graffiti, should be considered a form of art. At the same time, the practice of graffiti removal remains a manifestation of political and normative values and ideas about who can legitimately make their mark on surfaces in public space. With a point of departure in several empirical cases, this chapter considers aspects of the visual dialogues between graffiti writers and graffiti cleaners.

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Public Spaces through Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.