Umetna inteligenca in glasbena interpretacija

Generative AI is used to create music more and more. This chapter explores how this phenomenon affects aspects of musical interpretation. The way in which AI generates texts, pictures, music and other media indicates that compared to human creators – it is likely to reduce the range of interpretative variants in its output. This argument is developed in three steps: firstly, a number of examples of AI-generated songs are presented in order to outline what AI can do at the moment. Secondly, the way in which large language models (LLMs) – the underlying systems of many AI generators work is discussed, showing that LLMs have a tendency to standardise their results, while also removing any quirk or idiosyncrasy that human creators would (unconsciously) include. AI outputs are “depersonalised”, as it were. Thirdly, the concept of “model collapse” is introduced. It leads to further homogenisation as AI systems will inevitably include more and more data in their processes that are already AI-created, setting in motion a spiral of self-referentiality that is likely to lead to a collapse of the systems in the long run. While this may not be inevitable it poses enough of a risk to give us food for thought and spend more time assessing the danger posed to interpretative variety by generative AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Primorsk (University of Primorska)
Published
2025-12-18
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Umetna inteligenca in glasbena interpretacija

Wolfgang Marx
Repository of the University of Primorsk (University of Primorska)
Diverse Musicological Studies
article

Umetna inteligenca in glasbena interpretacija

Wolfgang Marx
article en

Abstract

Generative AI is used to create music more and more. This chapter explores how this phenomenon affects aspects of musical interpretation. The way in which AI generates texts, pictures, music and other media indicates that compared to human creators – it is likely to reduce the range of interpretative variants in its output. This argument is developed in three steps: firstly, a number of examples of AI-generated songs are presented in order to outline what AI can do at the moment. Secondly, the way in which large language models (LLMs) – the underlying systems of many AI generators work is discussed, showing that LLMs have a tendency to standardise their results, while also removing any quirk or idiosyncrasy that human creators would (unconsciously) include. AI outputs are “depersonalised”, as it were. Thirdly, the concept of “model collapse” is introduced. It leads to further homogenisation as AI systems will inevitably include more and more data in their processes that are already AI-created, setting in motion a spiral of self-referentiality that is likely to lead to a collapse of the systems in the long run. While this may not be inevitable it poses enough of a risk to give us food for thought and spend more time assessing the danger posed to interpretative variety by generative AI.

Repository of the University of Primorsk (University of Primorska)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Diverse Musicological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.