'I have seen my death!' X-Rays and the Occult

The question of whether a camera could capture spirits is almost as old as photography itself. After the glass-plate negatives of the 1850s enabled the creation of ghost-like double exposures, unscrupulous photographers such as the Boston-born William H. Mumler exploited grieving relatives during the American Civil War, while seventy years later Arthur Conan Doyle would publish his 1922 apologetic The Case for Spirit Photography in the aftermath of another catastrophic conflict. But the X-ray went still further, permitting viewers to see death in the midst of life, the skull beneath the skin, a memento mori given a glowing green patina of modernity. A cartoon in a February 1896 issue of Life magazine, published two months after Röntgen’s image of his wife’s hand had made headlines around the world, depicts a farmer posing with his tools while a photographer takes his portrait; seen through the lens of ‘The New Roentgen Photography’, the smiling dungaree-clad farmer is transformed into a scythe-wielding Grim Reaper. If an ordinary photograph, in the words of photography pioneer Henry Fox Talbot, owed its truthfulness to ‘nature drawing its own picture’, what did that suggest about the X-ray and its capacity to reveal the unseen?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Photography and Visual Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

'I have seen my death!' X-Rays and the Occult

Elizabeth Dearnley
Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University)
Photography and Visual Culture
article

'I have seen my death!' X-Rays and the Occult

Elizabeth Dearnley
article en

Abstract

The question of whether a camera could capture spirits is almost as old as photography itself. After the glass-plate negatives of the 1850s enabled the creation of ghost-like double exposures, unscrupulous photographers such as the Boston-born William H. Mumler exploited grieving relatives during the American Civil War, while seventy years later Arthur Conan Doyle would publish his 1922 apologetic The Case for Spirit Photography in the aftermath of another catastrophic conflict. But the X-ray went still further, permitting viewers to see death in the midst of life, the skull beneath the skin, a memento mori given a glowing green patina of modernity. A cartoon in a February 1896 issue of Life magazine, published two months after Röntgen’s image of his wife’s hand had made headlines around the world, depicts a farmer posing with his tools while a photographer takes his portrait; seen through the lens of ‘The New Roentgen Photography’, the smiling dungaree-clad farmer is transformed into a scythe-wielding Grim Reaper. If an ordinary photograph, in the words of photography pioneer Henry Fox Talbot, owed its truthfulness to ‘nature drawing its own picture’, what did that suggest about the X-ray and its capacity to reveal the unseen?

Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Photography and Visual Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.