Shifting emergency department utilization patterns among vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted nearly every aspect of modern society. The medical industry was underprepared for the pandemic-related shifts in emergency department (ED) utilization, which significantly altered healthcare access for millions of Americans, particularly those within socially vulnerable groups. To provide understanding of how the pandemic caused shifts in ED visit severity through the lens of the social determinants of health is critical for better informing healthcare policy decisions when we’re facing the next pandemic or disease-related disaster. A retrospective, observational cohort study spanning 2 years before and after the first COVID-19 case was declared in Tennessee on March 8, 2020. Data from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center’s Research Enterprise Data Warehouse (rEDW) was collected for over 1 million ED visits, each of which was assigned a visit reason by the NYU-EDA. Independent variables included age, race, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), healthcare system, and both community- and individual-level social vulnerability indicators. Patients were considered vulnerable by either a documented Z-code or a CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) below the 10th percentile. Our final analysis included 654,232 patients and 1,432,571 ED visits across the pre- and post- periods; 70,698 (11%) were considered socially vulnerable individuals. The average number of visits was 1.95 over two years, compared to 1.64 average visits for individuals in the two years following this date (95% CI = [0.29983, 0.32417]). The steepest decline occurred near the beginning of the pandemic. The difference in means was 0.32 (95% CI: [0.300, 0.324]). The mean ED visit per socially vulnerable patient saw a statistically significant decline after COVID-19 began, where the average visits decreased from 6.84 pre-COVID to 4.96 post-COVID (95% CI = [0.120, 0.180], [1.245, 2.515]). However, vulnerable populations had the highest average visits both before and after the pandemic’s onset. By quantifying ED utilization during the 2-year period before and after the pandemic, we revealed significant shifts in visit frequency and severity across different demographics and social vulnerability groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25693-7
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting emergency department utilization patterns among vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Leigh McCormack, Lokesh K. Chinthala, Elisabeth Elias, Charisse Madlock-Brown
BMC Public Health
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Shifting emergency department utilization patterns among vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Leigh McCormack, Lokesh K. Chinthala, Elisabeth Elias, Charisse Madlock-Brown
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted nearly every aspect of modern society. The medical industry was underprepared for the pandemic-related shifts in emergency department (ED) utilization, which significantly altered healthcare access for millions of Americans, particularly those within socially vulnerable groups. To provide understanding of how the pandemic caused shifts in ED visit severity through the lens of the social determinants of health is critical for better informing healthcare policy decisions when we’re facing the next pandemic or disease-related disaster. A retrospective, observational cohort study spanning 2 years before and after the first COVID-19 case was declared in Tennessee on March 8, 2020. Data from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center’s Research Enterprise Data Warehouse (rEDW) was collected for over 1 million ED visits, each of which was assigned a visit reason by the NYU-EDA. Independent variables included age, race, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), healthcare system, and both community- and individual-level social vulnerability indicators. Patients were considered vulnerable by either a documented Z-code or a CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) below the 10th percentile. Our final analysis included 654,232 patients and 1,432,571 ED visits across the pre- and post- periods; 70,698 (11%) were considered socially vulnerable individuals. The average number of visits was 1.95 over two years, compared to 1.64 average visits for individuals in the two years following this date (95% CI = [0.29983, 0.32417]). The steepest decline occurred near the beginning of the pandemic. The difference in means was 0.32 (95% CI: [0.300, 0.324]). The mean ED visit per socially vulnerable patient saw a statistically significant decline after COVID-19 began, where the average visits decreased from 6.84 pre-COVID to 4.96 post-COVID (95% CI = [0.120, 0.180], [1.245, 2.515]). However, vulnerable populations had the highest average visits both before and after the pandemic’s onset. By quantifying ED utilization during the 2-year period before and after the pandemic, we revealed significant shifts in visit frequency and severity across different demographics and social vulnerability groups.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
University of Iowa (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.