Modes of Killability: Individuals and Flocks as Patients in Veterinary Diagnostic Practices for Production Animals

ABSTRACT This article draws together sociological studies of diagnostic practice with human–animal studies and examines how Swedish veterinarians’ diagnostic practice for individual animals differs from diagnostic practice for groups of animals. The empirical focus of the article is diagnostic practice for dairy cattle and poultry in intensive production, and the study examines the relationship between knowing and managing disease and how the objects of veterinarian knowledge are shaped in interaction with animals’ social positions and their status as killable. The study shows that while diagnostic uncertainty is inherent in both dairy cattle and poultry settings, the enactment of disease, patienthood and appropriate response strategies differ significantly. The study argues that social aspects of diagnostic practice as well as the contingent character of diseases, bodies and patients are accentuated in relation to production animals. Moreover, the study shows how diagnostic practices participate in the ethical ordering of production animals’ lives and deaths but in different ways: They produce different modes of making animals killable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologia Ruralis
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.70025
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modes of Killability: Individuals and Flocks as Patients in Veterinary Diagnostic Practices for Production Animals

Hedvig Gröndal
Sociologia Ruralis
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Modes of Killability: Individuals and Flocks as Patients in Veterinary Diagnostic Practices for Production Animals

Hedvig Gröndal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article draws together sociological studies of diagnostic practice with human–animal studies and examines how Swedish veterinarians’ diagnostic practice for individual animals differs from diagnostic practice for groups of animals. The empirical focus of the article is diagnostic practice for dairy cattle and poultry in intensive production, and the study examines the relationship between knowing and managing disease and how the objects of veterinarian knowledge are shaped in interaction with animals’ social positions and their status as killable. The study shows that while diagnostic uncertainty is inherent in both dairy cattle and poultry settings, the enactment of disease, patienthood and appropriate response strategies differ significantly. The study argues that social aspects of diagnostic practice as well as the contingent character of diseases, bodies and patients are accentuated in relation to production animals. Moreover, the study shows how diagnostic practices participate in the ethical ordering of production animals’ lives and deaths but in different ways: They produce different modes of making animals killable.

Sociologia RuralisVol. 66(2)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modes of Killability: Individuals and Flocks as Patients in Veterinary Diagnostic Practices for Production Animals — Hedvig Gröndal · Sociologia Ruralis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS