Evaluation of forage grass response to nitrogen rate in a controlled greenhouse study

Abstract Productive forage with sufficient nutritive value is essential to profitable grazing operations. Application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer directly impacts pasture growth, but N rates must be carefully calibrated to minimize production costs and losses to the environment. We evaluated forage accumulation response, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and % 15 N recovery of meadow fescue [ Schedonorus pratensis (Huds.) P. Beauv.], orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), and endophyte‐free tall fescue [ Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub] in response to N rate in a controlled greenhouse environment using two soil types. Nitrogen was split‐applied at cumulative annual rates of 0, 67, 135, 202, 269, and 336 kg N/ha. The first N application was 15 N‐enriched 5% atom ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) solution, while the three subsequent N applications were made following harvest events with reagent‐grade NH 4 NO 3 . Nitrogen recovery from the first application was estimated from the atom % 15 N in the dry matter (DM) sample from each harvest event. For all species, DM forage accumulation increased with N rate up to 202 kg N/ha, and orchardgrass had the greatest DM accumulation at all N rates. NUE in all species declined with increased N. % 15 N recovery of the first fertilizer application was significantly different across species and N rates, ranging from 35% to 70%. In pasture systems with these species in warm summer continental climates, N fertilizer timing and application strategy should be calibrated with weather, pasture conditions, and livestock demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70308
Primary Topic
Plant and fungal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of forage grass response to nitrogen rate in a controlled greenhouse study

Jonathan Bleier, Alison J. Duff, G. E. Brink, Kevin Panke‐Buisse
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Plant and fungal interactions
article

Evaluation of forage grass response to nitrogen rate in a controlled greenhouse study

Jonathan Bleier, Alison J. Duff, G. E. Brink, Kevin Panke‐Buisse
article en

Abstract

Abstract Productive forage with sufficient nutritive value is essential to profitable grazing operations. Application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer directly impacts pasture growth, but N rates must be carefully calibrated to minimize production costs and losses to the environment. We evaluated forage accumulation response, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and % 15 N recovery of meadow fescue [ Schedonorus pratensis (Huds.) P. Beauv.], orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), and endophyte‐free tall fescue [ Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub] in response to N rate in a controlled greenhouse environment using two soil types. Nitrogen was split‐applied at cumulative annual rates of 0, 67, 135, 202, 269, and 336 kg N/ha. The first N application was 15 N‐enriched 5% atom ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) solution, while the three subsequent N applications were made following harvest events with reagent‐grade NH 4 NO 3 . Nitrogen recovery from the first application was estimated from the atom % 15 N in the dry matter (DM) sample from each harvest event. For all species, DM forage accumulation increased with N rate up to 202 kg N/ha, and orchardgrass had the greatest DM accumulation at all N rates. NUE in all species declined with increased N. % 15 N recovery of the first fertilizer application was significantly different across species and N rates, ranging from 35% to 70%. In pasture systems with these species in warm summer continental climates, N fertilizer timing and application strategy should be calibrated with weather, pasture conditions, and livestock demand.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 9(1)
U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Plant and fungal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.