Automating Self-Affirmation Essay Coding: Fine-Tuned BERT Performance Comparable to Human Coders and Comparison with GPT-4

Previous studies have demonstrated that a self-affirmation writing intervention, in which students reflect on personally important values, positively impacts students' school performance, and there is active research on this intervention. However, this research requires manual coding of students' writing exercises, and this manual coding has proved to be a time-consuming and expensive undertaking. To assist future self-affirmation intervention studies or educators implementing the writing exercise, we employed our labeled data to fine-tune a pre-trained language model that achieves a comparable level of performance to that of human coders (Cohen's Kappa: 0.85 between machine coding and human coders as compared to 0.83 between human coders). To explore the potential of more advanced language models without requiring a large training dataset, we also evaluated OpenAI's GPT-4 in a zero-shot and few-shot classification setting. GPT-4's zero-shot predictions yield reasonable accuracy but do not reach the fine-tuned BERT model's performance or human-level agreement. Adding example essays (few-shot prompting) did not appreciably improve GPT-4's results. Our analysis also finds that the BERT model's performance is consistent across student subgroups, with minimal disparity between "stereotype-threatened" and "non-threatened" students, which are the focal groups for comparison in the self-affirmation intervention. We further demonstrate the generalizability of the fine-tuned model on an external dataset collected by a different research team: the model maintained a high agreement with human coders (Cohen's Kappa = 0.86) on this new sample. These results suggest that a fine-tuned transformer model can reliably code self-affirmation essays, thereby reducing the coding burden for future researchers and educators. We make the fine-tuned model publicly available to help the research community automate the burdensome task of coding at https://github.com/visortown/bert-self-affirm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435843
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Self-Affirmation Essay Coding: Fine-Tuned BERT Performance Comparable to Human Coders and Comparison with GPT-4

Geoffrey D. Borman, Trisha Borman, Cong Ye
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mental Health via Writing
article

Automating Self-Affirmation Essay Coding: Fine-Tuned BERT Performance Comparable to Human Coders and Comparison with GPT-4

Geoffrey D. Borman, Trisha Borman, Cong Ye
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that a self-affirmation writing intervention, in which students reflect on personally important values, positively impacts students' school performance, and there is active research on this intervention. However, this research requires manual coding of students' writing exercises, and this manual coding has proved to be a time-consuming and expensive undertaking. To assist future self-affirmation intervention studies or educators implementing the writing exercise, we employed our labeled data to fine-tune a pre-trained language model that achieves a comparable level of performance to that of human coders (Cohen's Kappa: 0.85 between machine coding and human coders as compared to 0.83 between human coders). To explore the potential of more advanced language models without requiring a large training dataset, we also evaluated OpenAI's GPT-4 in a zero-shot and few-shot classification setting. GPT-4's zero-shot predictions yield reasonable accuracy but do not reach the fine-tuned BERT model's performance or human-level agreement. Adding example essays (few-shot prompting) did not appreciably improve GPT-4's results. Our analysis also finds that the BERT model's performance is consistent across student subgroups, with minimal disparity between "stereotype-threatened" and "non-threatened" students, which are the focal groups for comparison in the self-affirmation intervention. We further demonstrate the generalizability of the fine-tuned model on an external dataset collected by a different research team: the model maintained a high agreement with human coders (Cohen's Kappa = 0.86) on this new sample. These results suggest that a fine-tuned transformer model can reliably code self-affirmation essays, thereby reducing the coding burden for future researchers and educators. We make the fine-tuned model publicly available to help the research community automate the burdensome task of coding at https://github.com/visortown/bert-self-affirm.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
American Institutes for Research (US), Arizona State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.