Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review

Drug development in oncology is facing rising complexity, prolonged timelines, and increasing costs, with many trials failing to reach completion or secure regulatory approval for the investigated treatment. Against this backdrop, artificial intelligence (AI) and real-world data have emerged as promising tools to improve the efficiency and quality of clinical research. This narrative review explores how AI can support clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis. AI-driven methods can streamline information gathering, optimize eligibility criteria, and predict trial success, thereby reducing costly failures. Patient recruitment and retention, often the most challenging aspects of oncology trials, may benefit from AI-supported matching algorithms, digital health technologies, and personalized interactions. During trial conduct, natural language processing and sensor-based monitoring offer opportunities to reduce administrative burden and capture real-world, patient-centred outcomes. For trial analyses, AI enhances radiology, digital pathology, pharmacometrics, and multimodal modelling, enabling more accurate prognostic and predictive insights. In addition, AI-based simulations, such as digital twins and <i>in silico</i> trials, hold potential to complement conventional trial designs. However, despite rapid technical advances, evidence supporting clinical utility remains limited. Most applications are tested retrospectively or in single-centre settings, limiting generalizability. Regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and emerging ESMO standards for AI-based biomarkers, emphasize transparency, reproducibility, and prospective validation. Ultimately, the successful integration of AI into oncology trials will depend less on technical capacity than on rigorous evaluation, harmonized regulation, and adoption of shared quality standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2026.100682
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review

RSN Fehrmann, D.J.A. de Groot, M. van Kruchten, D.G. Knapen et al.
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review

RSN Fehrmann, D.J.A. de Groot, M. van Kruchten, D.G. Knapen, K.E. Broekman
article en

Abstract

Drug development in oncology is facing rising complexity, prolonged timelines, and increasing costs, with many trials failing to reach completion or secure regulatory approval for the investigated treatment. Against this backdrop, artificial intelligence (AI) and real-world data have emerged as promising tools to improve the efficiency and quality of clinical research. This narrative review explores how AI can support clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis. AI-driven methods can streamline information gathering, optimize eligibility criteria, and predict trial success, thereby reducing costly failures. Patient recruitment and retention, often the most challenging aspects of oncology trials, may benefit from AI-supported matching algorithms, digital health technologies, and personalized interactions. During trial conduct, natural language processing and sensor-based monitoring offer opportunities to reduce administrative burden and capture real-world, patient-centred outcomes. For trial analyses, AI enhances radiology, digital pathology, pharmacometrics, and multimodal modelling, enabling more accurate prognostic and predictive insights. In addition, AI-based simulations, such as digital twins and <i>in silico</i> trials, hold potential to complement conventional trial designs. However, despite rapid technical advances, evidence supporting clinical utility remains limited. Most applications are tested retrospectively or in single-centre settings, limiting generalizability. Regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and emerging ESMO standards for AI-based biomarkers, emphasize transparency, reproducibility, and prospective validation. Ultimately, the successful integration of AI into oncology trials will depend less on technical capacity than on rigorous evaluation, harmonized regulation, and adoption of shared quality standards.

ESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologyVol. 11
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.