Evaluating AI-aided approaches for 18F-FDG PET quantification: Indirect synthetic MR-based versus direct partial volume correction

Compatible deployment of AI-aided methods for PET quantification is an important prerequisite to maximizing their benefits. We focus on partial volume correction (PVC), which can substantially improve the precision of radiotracer uptake quantification in brain PET for intricate and atrophic regions. Conventional post-reconstruction PVC requires anatomical MR images that are often unavailable or of inadequate quality. We address this limitation by systematically evaluating two AI-aided strategies: (1) indirect PVC, which uses synthesized MR images for anatomical guidance, and (2) direct PVC, which predicts corrected PET images without anatomical processing. Multiple AI architectures were assessed under both strategies, using paired <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET + CT + MR datasets from multiple scanner sites. Indirect PVC consistently outperformed direct approaches across all tested architectures with the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model yielding the best overall performance while preserving compatibility with standard PET processing pipelines. Both AI-aided approaches increased the utility of standalone <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in clinical and research applications without requiring anatomical MR images. Indirect PVC showed advantages in transparency and performance for quantification in smaller anatomical regions, whereas direct PVC may be more suitable for rapid assessment in larger brain regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121756
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating AI-aided approaches for 18F-FDG PET quantification: Indirect synthetic MR-based versus direct partial volume correction

Seongho Seo, Yu Jin Seol, Eun Jin Yoon, Hye Bin Yoo et al.
NeuroImage
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Evaluating AI-aided approaches for 18F-FDG PET quantification: Indirect synthetic MR-based versus direct partial volume correction

Seongho Seo, Yu Jin Seol, Eun Jin Yoon, Hye Bin Yoo, Yu Kyeong Kim, Jae Sung Lee
article en

Abstract

Compatible deployment of AI-aided methods for PET quantification is an important prerequisite to maximizing their benefits. We focus on partial volume correction (PVC), which can substantially improve the precision of radiotracer uptake quantification in brain PET for intricate and atrophic regions. Conventional post-reconstruction PVC requires anatomical MR images that are often unavailable or of inadequate quality. We address this limitation by systematically evaluating two AI-aided strategies: (1) indirect PVC, which uses synthesized MR images for anatomical guidance, and (2) direct PVC, which predicts corrected PET images without anatomical processing. Multiple AI architectures were assessed under both strategies, using paired <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET + CT + MR datasets from multiple scanner sites. Indirect PVC consistently outperformed direct approaches across all tested architectures with the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model yielding the best overall performance while preserving compatibility with standard PET processing pipelines. Both AI-aided approaches increased the utility of standalone <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in clinical and research applications without requiring anatomical MR images. Indirect PVC showed advantages in transparency and performance for quantification in smaller anatomical regions, whereas direct PVC may be more suitable for rapid assessment in larger brain regions.

NeuroImageVol. 328
Pai Chai University (KR), Seoul National University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), New Generation University College (ET), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), National University College (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.