Linear reflected backward stochastic differential equations arising from vulnerable claims in markets with random horizon

This paper considers the setting governed by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> is the "public" flow of information, and <i>τ</i> is a random time which might not be <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> -observable. This framework covers credit risk and life insurance. In this setting, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> is assumed to be generated by a <i>d</i>-dimensional Brownian motion <i>W</i> and <i>ξ</i> is a vulnerable claim, whose payment's policy depends <i>essentially</i> on the occurrence of <i>τ</i>. The hedging problems, in many directions, for this claim led to the question of studying the linear reflected-backward-stochastic differential equations (RBSDE hereafter), <DispFormula> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mtable> <mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∧</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∧</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> <mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mtext>on</mml:mtext> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>〚</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>〚</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>-a.s.</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> </mml:mtable> </mml:math> </DispFormula> This is the objective of this paper. For this RBSDE and without any further assumption on <i>τ</i> that might neglect any risk intrinsic to its stochasticity, we answer the following: a) What are the sufficient minimal conditions on the data <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> that guarantee the existence of the solution to this RBSDE? b) How can we estimate the solution in norm using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> ? c) Is there an <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> -RBSDE that is intimately related to the current one and how their solutions are related to each other? This latter question has practical and theoretical leitmotivs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-026-04059-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stochastic processes and financial applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
59.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear reflected backward stochastic differential equations arising from vulnerable claims in markets with random horizon

1 citations
Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models
Stochastic processes and financial applications
59.40
article

Linear reflected backward stochastic differential equations arising from vulnerable claims in markets with random horizon

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the setting governed by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> is the "public" flow of information, and <i>τ</i> is a random time which might not be <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> -observable. This framework covers credit risk and life insurance. In this setting, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> is assumed to be generated by a <i>d</i>-dimensional Brownian motion <i>W</i> and <i>ξ</i> is a vulnerable claim, whose payment's policy depends <i>essentially</i> on the occurrence of <i>τ</i>. The hedging problems, in many directions, for this claim led to the question of studying the linear reflected-backward-stochastic differential equations (RBSDE hereafter), <DispFormula> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mtable> <mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∧</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∧</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> <mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mtext>on</mml:mtext> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>〚</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>〚</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>-a.s.</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> </mml:mtable> </mml:math> </DispFormula> This is the objective of this paper. For this RBSDE and without any further assumption on <i>τ</i> that might neglect any risk intrinsic to its stochasticity, we answer the following: a) What are the sufficient minimal conditions on the data <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> that guarantee the existence of the solution to this RBSDE? b) How can we estimate the solution in norm using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> ? c) Is there an <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math> -RBSDE that is intimately related to the current one and how their solutions are related to each other? This latter question has practical and theoretical leitmotivs.

Advances in Continuous and Discrete ModelsVol. 2026(1)
University of Alberta (CA), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Stochastic processes and financial applications
59.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.