The Illusion of Third-Party Support: Why Third-Party Candidates Struggle to Consolidate Disaffected Voters

Abstract Voters in the United States consistently express to pollsters that they would like a third-party option, yet third-party candidates rarely earn their votes. In this study, we demonstrate why expressed support for a third-party candidate does not match actual support because the inclination to vote for a third-party candidate does not align with a consistent political ideology. We utilize a novel experiment (N = 777) to demonstrate that, though there is a sizable number of people generally supportive of a third-party candidate, once a candidate is placed on the ideological spectrum, many of these voters are unlikely to support them. We then present a study of the 2024 U.S. presidential election (N = 556) in which we find robust desire to support a third-party candidate in general but a complete absence of specific candidate support. Overall, we find that third-party candidates face considerable ideological barriers to actual support at the ballot box despite voters’ professed desire for a third-party candidate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edag002
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Illusion of Third-Party Support: Why Third-Party Candidates Struggle to Consolidate Disaffected Voters

Benjamin R. Warner, Ryan Neville-Shepard
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The Illusion of Third-Party Support: Why Third-Party Candidates Struggle to Consolidate Disaffected Voters

Benjamin R. Warner, Ryan Neville-Shepard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Voters in the United States consistently express to pollsters that they would like a third-party option, yet third-party candidates rarely earn their votes. In this study, we demonstrate why expressed support for a third-party candidate does not match actual support because the inclination to vote for a third-party candidate does not align with a consistent political ideology. We utilize a novel experiment (N = 777) to demonstrate that, though there is a sizable number of people generally supportive of a third-party candidate, once a candidate is placed on the ideological spectrum, many of these voters are unlikely to support them. We then present a study of the 2024 U.S. presidential election (N = 556) in which we find robust desire to support a third-party candidate in general but a complete absence of specific candidate support. Overall, we find that third-party candidates face considerable ideological barriers to actual support at the ballot box despite voters’ professed desire for a third-party candidate.

International Journal of Public Opinion ResearchVol. 38(1)
University of Missouri (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.