The mediating effect of family support on stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility: a cross-sectional study

Infertility affects women’s physical health and imposes significant levels of stigma and psychological distress. While family support is a protective factor for mental health, its specific role in the pathway between stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility has not been fully elucidated. Examining this pathway is crucial for formulating targeted family interventions, as clarifying these relationships is essential for improving the mental well-being of these patients. This study adopted a cross-sectional design and convenience sampling of 204 female patients with infertility, ages 23 to 43, who visited the Reproductive Medicine Department of a tertiary A-grade hospital in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, between February and March 2025. The Infertility Stigma Scale (ISS), Distress Thermometer (DT), and the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (Family APGAR) scale were administered to the participants. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS 25.0. Female patients with infertility reported relatively high levels of perceived stigma. Pearson correlation analysis showed that stigma was positively correlated with psychological distress (r = 0.561, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with family support (r = − 0.600, p < 0.05) and psychological distress was negatively correlated with family support (r = − 0.432, p < 0.05). Mediation effect analysis indicated that the total effect of stigma on psychological distress was 0.204 (95% CI: 0.142–0.266), the effect size of the direct impact of stigma on psychological distress was 0.165 (95% CI: 0.094–0.235), and the mediating effect of family support indirectly influencing psychological distress was 0.039 (95% CI: 0.005–0.077), accounting for 19.1% of the total effect. Family support partially mediates the association between perceived stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility. These findings suggest that clinical interventions should focus on individual patients while also incorporating family-centered approaches. Assessing and bolstering the quality of family support could be a key strategy for buffering the negative psychological impact of infertility-related stigma. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution because of the cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inference, and the single-center sample, which may limit generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04312-6
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The mediating effect of family support on stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility: a cross-sectional study

Yong Ouyang, Zixing Wang, Ying Zhao, Liling Jiang
BMC Women s Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

The mediating effect of family support on stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility: a cross-sectional study

Yong Ouyang, Zixing Wang, Ying Zhao, Liling Jiang
article en

Abstract

Infertility affects women’s physical health and imposes significant levels of stigma and psychological distress. While family support is a protective factor for mental health, its specific role in the pathway between stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility has not been fully elucidated. Examining this pathway is crucial for formulating targeted family interventions, as clarifying these relationships is essential for improving the mental well-being of these patients. This study adopted a cross-sectional design and convenience sampling of 204 female patients with infertility, ages 23 to 43, who visited the Reproductive Medicine Department of a tertiary A-grade hospital in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, between February and March 2025. The Infertility Stigma Scale (ISS), Distress Thermometer (DT), and the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (Family APGAR) scale were administered to the participants. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS 25.0. Female patients with infertility reported relatively high levels of perceived stigma. Pearson correlation analysis showed that stigma was positively correlated with psychological distress (r = 0.561, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with family support (r = − 0.600, p < 0.05) and psychological distress was negatively correlated with family support (r = − 0.432, p < 0.05). Mediation effect analysis indicated that the total effect of stigma on psychological distress was 0.204 (95% CI: 0.142–0.266), the effect size of the direct impact of stigma on psychological distress was 0.165 (95% CI: 0.094–0.235), and the mediating effect of family support indirectly influencing psychological distress was 0.039 (95% CI: 0.005–0.077), accounting for 19.1% of the total effect. Family support partially mediates the association between perceived stigma and psychological distress among female patients with infertility. These findings suggest that clinical interventions should focus on individual patients while also incorporating family-centered approaches. Assessing and bolstering the quality of family support could be a key strategy for buffering the negative psychological impact of infertility-related stigma. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution because of the cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inference, and the single-center sample, which may limit generalizability.

BMC Women s HealthVol. 26(1)
Gannan Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.