Are AI Coaching Agents Learning Friend or Foe?: A Qualitative Study of Learning and Development Leaders' Perceptions of AI Coaching Agents Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

ABSTRACT This qualitative study examines how learning and development (L&D) leaders perceive and evaluate AI‐enabled coaching agents and identifies factors shaping organisational adoption. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 11 senior L&D and HR leaders from large organisations who had recent experience of using generative AI coaching tools. Reflexive thematic analysis generated six themes relating to perceived value at scale, hybrid human–AI delivery preferences, adoption barriers, perceived conversational strengths and limitations, trust and governance concerns, and equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) considerations. Findings are interpreted through UTAUT2 to clarify how performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, habit and perceived value are refracted through organisational risk, data protection, trust and inclusion. The study contributes an adoption‐focused account of how commissioners of workplace learning and development assess coaching and the emergence of AI coach agents, offering implications for governance, implementation design and future research on responsible deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Training and Development
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.70028
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are AI Coaching Agents Learning Friend or Foe?: A Qualitative Study of Learning and Development Leaders' Perceptions of AI Coaching Agents Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

Jonathan Passmore, Jane Daly
International Journal of Training and Development
AI in Service Interactions
article

Are AI Coaching Agents Learning Friend or Foe?: A Qualitative Study of Learning and Development Leaders' Perceptions of AI Coaching Agents Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

Jonathan Passmore, Jane Daly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This qualitative study examines how learning and development (L&D) leaders perceive and evaluate AI‐enabled coaching agents and identifies factors shaping organisational adoption. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 11 senior L&D and HR leaders from large organisations who had recent experience of using generative AI coaching tools. Reflexive thematic analysis generated six themes relating to perceived value at scale, hybrid human–AI delivery preferences, adoption barriers, perceived conversational strengths and limitations, trust and governance concerns, and equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) considerations. Findings are interpreted through UTAUT2 to clarify how performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, habit and perceived value are refracted through organisational risk, data protection, trust and inclusion. The study contributes an adoption‐focused account of how commissioners of workplace learning and development assess coaching and the emergence of AI coach agents, offering implications for governance, implementation design and future research on responsible deployment.

International Journal of Training and Development
University of Reading (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.