A Comparison of Monte Carlo Based Marginal Likelihood Estimators

ABSTRACT Marginal likelihood plays a central role in Bayesian model comparison and hypothesis testing, but its computation is often challenging in practice. This article reviews recent Monte Carlo methods that rely on the availability of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posterior and prior distributions along with the corresponding unnormalized kernels that can be evaluated numerically. Within this scope, we summarize the strengths, limitations, differences, and connections of different methods. Two in‐depth applications are presented to illustrate their relative performance. This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Monte Carlo Methods Statistical Models > Model Selection Statistical Models > Bayesian Models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.70058
Primary Topic
Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Monte Carlo Based Marginal Likelihood Estimators

Analisa Milkey, Aolan Li, Ming‐Hui Chen, Paul O. Lewis et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics
Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
article

A Comparison of Monte Carlo Based Marginal Likelihood Estimators

Analisa Milkey, Aolan Li, Ming‐Hui Chen, Paul O. Lewis, Pang‐Yu Liu, Yu‐Bo Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marginal likelihood plays a central role in Bayesian model comparison and hypothesis testing, but its computation is often challenging in practice. This article reviews recent Monte Carlo methods that rely on the availability of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posterior and prior distributions along with the corresponding unnormalized kernels that can be evaluated numerically. Within this scope, we summarize the strengths, limitations, differences, and connections of different methods. Two in‐depth applications are presented to illustrate their relative performance. This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Monte Carlo Methods Statistical Models > Model Selection Statistical Models > Bayesian Models

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational StatisticsVol. 18(1)
University of Connecticut (US), Clemson University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of Monte Carlo Based Marginal Likelihood Estimators — Analisa Milkey, Aolan Li, et al. · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS