Long‐read sequencing for biodiversity analyses—A comprehensive guide

Abstract DNA‐based monitoring of biodiversity has revolutionised our ability to describe communities and rapidly assess anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity. Currently established molecular methods for biomonitoring rely heavily on classic metabarcoding utilising short reads, mostly through Illumina data. However, increasingly more studies use long‐read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), for analyses of environmental DNA (eDNA) and DNA barcoding. These long‐read sequencing approaches can be advantageous over existing methods by providing increased information content and opening new avenues for understanding biodiversity at a larger scale. In this review, we provide an overview of studies to date using long‐read sequencing platforms for biodiversity analyses of eukaryotes, from eDNA and community metabarcoding, shotgun sequencing, and DNA barcoding. We also give detailed information on each step required for sample processing, data generation and analysis of long‐read sequencing datasets for biodiversity applications. Even though the number of studies using long‐read sequencing technologies is rapidly increasing, clear established guidelines for sample preparation or analysis of such datasets are lacking. Furthermore, a side‐by‐side review for both ONT and PacBio technologies across different applications has not been presented. Long‐read sequencing platforms provide possibilities for metabarcoding (PCR‐based) of both short and long fragments, shotgun sequencing (PCR‐free), or DNA barcoding. ONT platforms, in particular, can also allow real‐time data acquisition, while the portability of the MinION instrument can support sequencing in the field. PacBio, on the other hand, can provide highly accurate reads and can be used to reliably address open questions in ecology and evolution for difficult‐to‐characterise taxa such as microeukaryotes. Streamlining the use of these technologies could enable sequencing of whole organelles or population‐level assessments from environmental samples, which would be a step change for DNA‐based monitoring. Here, we review existing applications, applied methodology, and future perspectives in the field. Overall, we aim to facilitate the use of long‐read sequencing technologies by the wider community, promote best practices for data generation and standardised data reporting that supports reproducibility, and to encourage open data policies and tools.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70250
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐read sequencing for biodiversity analyses—A comprehensive guide

Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Long‐read sequencing for biodiversity analyses—A comprehensive guide

article en

Abstract

Abstract DNA‐based monitoring of biodiversity has revolutionised our ability to describe communities and rapidly assess anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity. Currently established molecular methods for biomonitoring rely heavily on classic metabarcoding utilising short reads, mostly through Illumina data. However, increasingly more studies use long‐read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), for analyses of environmental DNA (eDNA) and DNA barcoding. These long‐read sequencing approaches can be advantageous over existing methods by providing increased information content and opening new avenues for understanding biodiversity at a larger scale. In this review, we provide an overview of studies to date using long‐read sequencing platforms for biodiversity analyses of eukaryotes, from eDNA and community metabarcoding, shotgun sequencing, and DNA barcoding. We also give detailed information on each step required for sample processing, data generation and analysis of long‐read sequencing datasets for biodiversity applications. Even though the number of studies using long‐read sequencing technologies is rapidly increasing, clear established guidelines for sample preparation or analysis of such datasets are lacking. Furthermore, a side‐by‐side review for both ONT and PacBio technologies across different applications has not been presented. Long‐read sequencing platforms provide possibilities for metabarcoding (PCR‐based) of both short and long fragments, shotgun sequencing (PCR‐free), or DNA barcoding. ONT platforms, in particular, can also allow real‐time data acquisition, while the portability of the MinION instrument can support sequencing in the field. PacBio, on the other hand, can provide highly accurate reads and can be used to reliably address open questions in ecology and evolution for difficult‐to‐characterise taxa such as microeukaryotes. Streamlining the use of these technologies could enable sequencing of whole organelles or population‐level assessments from environmental samples, which would be a step change for DNA‐based monitoring. Here, we review existing applications, applied methodology, and future perspectives in the field. Overall, we aim to facilitate the use of long‐read sequencing technologies by the wider community, promote best practices for data generation and standardised data reporting that supports reproducibility, and to encourage open data policies and tools.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 17(3)
Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.