Feeding the debate: Do masticatory muscles resist age-related decline better than lower limb muscles?
Age-related declines in muscle mass and strength result from intrinsic ageing and reduced mechanical loading. Masticatory muscles, being continuously used for feeding, may be less affected. We cross-sectionally compared ageing effects on locomotor and masticatory muscles in 30 women: young (26±1.8 y), middle-aged (44.1±3.4 y), and older (69.5±3.1 y). Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris and masseter was assessed by panoramic ultrasound, and knee extension torque (KE) and bite force (BF) were measured via isokinetic dynamometry and a bite force sensor. Both muscles showed progressive age-related reductions. Quadriceps CSA declined to ~75% in middle-aged and 56 ± 13% (older) of young values, while masseter CSA declined to ~94% and 79%, respectively. Strength also declined (KE: ~81% and 62%; BF: ~75% and ~68% of young values; all <i>p</i><0.05), with no difference between middle-aged and older adults. Effect sizes for CSA were larger in the quadriceps (d = 1.56-2.95) than masseter (d = 0.29-1.09). For strength, effect sizes from young to middle-aged were similar for KE and BF (d = 1.20 vs. 1.33) but greater for KE from young to older adults (d = 2.28 vs. 1.16). Both muscles were smaller and weaker in older groups, but while quadriceps strength roughly mirrored CSA reductions, masseter strength declined disproportionately, suggesting neuromuscular contributions beyond muscle size.
Authors
- Robert Csapo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-2799)
- Gustavo Z. Schaun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-714X)
- Peter Raidl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-734X)
- Michelle Slunecko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9340-506X)
- Anja Götz
Institutions
- University of Vienna (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2624232
- Primary Topic
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00