Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling

Although the structural basis of selective G-protein coupling to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is well characterized, the mechanisms underlying selective interactions between distinct Gα subtypes (Gαs, Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12/13) and Gβγ remain poorly understood. While conserved residues in Gα subtypes are often assumed to have similar functions, they may instead modulate coupling selectivity by altering the frequency and stability of contacts at the Gα:Gβγ interface. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with the interpretable machine learning method, Bayesian Network Model (BNM), and protein-protein proximity (BRET) assays, we show that conserved residues in the two closely related Gαi/o and Gαq/11 subfamilies contribute differentially to Gβγ coupling. These conserved residue "hotspots" on Gαi and Gαq produced divergent functional effects on Gβγ coupling, indicating that conservation does not ensure functional equivalence. These findings suggest that local microenvironment and paralog-specific allosteric coupling shape how conserved interface residues contribute to protein-protein coupling. The framework provides a systematic approach for dissecting subtype-specific mechanisms, with implications for drug design and for annotating the functional relevance of disease-associated variants. The computational methods used here are broadly applicable to other homologous protein families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.29.702674
Primary Topic
Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling

Andréi S. Rodin, G. L. Johnson, Ning Ma, Wenyuan Wei et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
article

Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling

Andréi S. Rodin, G. L. Johnson, Ning Ma, Wenyuan Wei, Nagarajan Vaidehi, H. Dalton Taylor
article en

Abstract

Although the structural basis of selective G-protein coupling to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is well characterized, the mechanisms underlying selective interactions between distinct Gα subtypes (Gαs, Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12/13) and Gβγ remain poorly understood. While conserved residues in Gα subtypes are often assumed to have similar functions, they may instead modulate coupling selectivity by altering the frequency and stability of contacts at the Gα:Gβγ interface. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with the interpretable machine learning method, Bayesian Network Model (BNM), and protein-protein proximity (BRET) assays, we show that conserved residues in the two closely related Gαi/o and Gαq/11 subfamilies contribute differentially to Gβγ coupling. These conserved residue "hotspots" on Gαi and Gαq produced divergent functional effects on Gβγ coupling, indicating that conservation does not ensure functional equivalence. These findings suggest that local microenvironment and paralog-specific allosteric coupling shape how conserved interface residues contribute to protein-protein coupling. The framework provides a systematic approach for dissecting subtype-specific mechanisms, with implications for drug design and for annotating the functional relevance of disease-associated variants. The computational methods used here are broadly applicable to other homologous protein families.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), City of Hope (US)
National Institutes of Health
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.