How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

This commentary discusses whether the problem motivating this special issue, that is, the frequently small and inconsistent effects of teaching-quality indicators, is the main problem of research on teaching quality. The core problem might actually be a suboptimal theoretical foundation, a common problem in research on learning and instruction. Against this background, one of the main strengths of this special issue’s articles is that they elaborate on the importance of theory. They describe very profound analyses of the shortcomings of past and current research on teaching quality, leading to highly ambitious proposals for future research. However, we also need to define realistic, doable goals to advance research on teaching quality in the near future. For this purpose, we propose a type of argumentative validity perspective on teaching quality, that is, developing conceptualizations of teaching quality that are valid when addressing specific research goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284027
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl
article en

Abstract

This commentary discusses whether the problem motivating this special issue, that is, the frequently small and inconsistent effects of teaching-quality indicators, is the main problem of research on teaching quality. The core problem might actually be a suboptimal theoretical foundation, a common problem in research on learning and instruction. Against this background, one of the main strengths of this special issue’s articles is that they elaborate on the importance of theory. They describe very profound analyses of the shortcomings of past and current research on teaching quality, leading to highly ambitious proposals for future research. However, we also need to define realistic, doable goals to advance research on teaching quality in the near future. For this purpose, we propose a type of argumentative validity perspective on teaching quality, that is, developing conceptualizations of teaching quality that are valid when addressing specific research goals.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful — Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl · Universität Zürich, ZORA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS