Editorial: Exploring neuromodulation and neuroimaging techniques for psychiatric disorders: insights from preclinical and clinical studies

results showed that stimulation reduced hyperlocomotion and stereotyped behaviors. Using local field potential recordings, fiber photometry, and optogenetics, the authors showed that local GABAergic neurons in the VTA, rather than dopaminergic neurons, were responsible for mediating these effects. This study contributed to the mechanistic understanding of circuit-specific effects of DBS and provides preliminary evidence that targeting the VTA may be beneficial in treating the positive symptoms of psychosis.While preclinical DBS studies provide critical mechanistic insight into how modulation of specific brain circuits can influence symptoms and behavior, translating these findings to broader clinical populations requires stimulation approaches capable of achieving precise, focal modulation of deep brain structures. Yatsuda et al. examined temporal interference (TI) stimulation for targeting deep brain regions at the population level. They found that the same montage consistently modulated deep targets across populations, although with variable focality. The tradeoff between deep stimulation and unwanted cortical modulation was target-dependent.Furthermore, compared to transcranial alternating current stimulation, TI reduced unwanted cortical modulation at least 1.5-fold, but showed higher variability. These findings offer practical guidance for montage selection while highlighting the target-dependent trade-offs that must be considered when applying TI clinically.Targeting considerations also motivated the work of Wu et al., who presented a protocol to test whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex can alleviate anhedonia in schizophrenia. Their trial will randomize 82 patients to active or sham stimulation using an intermittent theta-burst protocol twice daily for 15 days.Assessments will include anhedonia symptoms, cognitive function, and prefrontal hemodynamic activity via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) at baseline, post-treatment, and four-week follow-up. If the clinical trial proves effective, this approach could offer a new intervention strategy for negative symptoms. fNIRS also featured in the work of Hui et al., although here as a diagnostic marker rather than the outcome measure. They compared prefrontal activation during verbal fluency tasks using fNIRS in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), unipolar depression (UD), and healthy participants. The results indicated that both the BD and UD groups showed less oxygenated hemoglobin activation than controls, with BD showing the least total activation. Activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during a semantic fluency task differed between BD and UD, suggesting a potential biomarker for differential diagnosis. Moreover, the phonological fluency task produced greater prefrontal activation than the semantic fluency task for UD and control participants, but not for those with BD, indicating that patterns of neural engagement in these tasks may be different between these groups. Brunelin et al. demonstrated circuit-informed neuromodulation in practice in a case study of hoarding disorder. This disorder is typically resistant to existing treatments. They targeted the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which plays a role in impulse control. Accelerated cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied with three 20-minute daily sessions over five days. There were improvements in acquisition behaviour and mood, while no adverse effects were observed. While a single case cannot establish efficacy, this report suggests that neuromodulation may offer new possibilities for people with limited therapeutic options.Together, these five contributions illustrate how neuroimaging and neuromodulation, applied independently or in combination, can advance psychiatric research from multiple perspectives. As the technologies continue to mature, they will offer increasingly precise ways to understand, diagnose, and treat psychiatric disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1790803
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial: Exploring neuromodulation and neuroimaging techniques for psychiatric disorders: insights from preclinical and clinical studies

Ünal Sakoğlu, Elisa Kallioniemi, Martin Dietz
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Editorial: Exploring neuromodulation and neuroimaging techniques for psychiatric disorders: insights from preclinical and clinical studies

Ünal Sakoğlu, Elisa Kallioniemi, Martin Dietz
article en

Abstract

results showed that stimulation reduced hyperlocomotion and stereotyped behaviors. Using local field potential recordings, fiber photometry, and optogenetics, the authors showed that local GABAergic neurons in the VTA, rather than dopaminergic neurons, were responsible for mediating these effects. This study contributed to the mechanistic understanding of circuit-specific effects of DBS and provides preliminary evidence that targeting the VTA may be beneficial in treating the positive symptoms of psychosis.While preclinical DBS studies provide critical mechanistic insight into how modulation of specific brain circuits can influence symptoms and behavior, translating these findings to broader clinical populations requires stimulation approaches capable of achieving precise, focal modulation of deep brain structures. Yatsuda et al. examined temporal interference (TI) stimulation for targeting deep brain regions at the population level. They found that the same montage consistently modulated deep targets across populations, although with variable focality. The tradeoff between deep stimulation and unwanted cortical modulation was target-dependent.Furthermore, compared to transcranial alternating current stimulation, TI reduced unwanted cortical modulation at least 1.5-fold, but showed higher variability. These findings offer practical guidance for montage selection while highlighting the target-dependent trade-offs that must be considered when applying TI clinically.Targeting considerations also motivated the work of Wu et al., who presented a protocol to test whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex can alleviate anhedonia in schizophrenia. Their trial will randomize 82 patients to active or sham stimulation using an intermittent theta-burst protocol twice daily for 15 days.Assessments will include anhedonia symptoms, cognitive function, and prefrontal hemodynamic activity via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) at baseline, post-treatment, and four-week follow-up. If the clinical trial proves effective, this approach could offer a new intervention strategy for negative symptoms. fNIRS also featured in the work of Hui et al., although here as a diagnostic marker rather than the outcome measure. They compared prefrontal activation during verbal fluency tasks using fNIRS in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), unipolar depression (UD), and healthy participants. The results indicated that both the BD and UD groups showed less oxygenated hemoglobin activation than controls, with BD showing the least total activation. Activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during a semantic fluency task differed between BD and UD, suggesting a potential biomarker for differential diagnosis. Moreover, the phonological fluency task produced greater prefrontal activation than the semantic fluency task for UD and control participants, but not for those with BD, indicating that patterns of neural engagement in these tasks may be different between these groups. Brunelin et al. demonstrated circuit-informed neuromodulation in practice in a case study of hoarding disorder. This disorder is typically resistant to existing treatments. They targeted the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which plays a role in impulse control. Accelerated cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied with three 20-minute daily sessions over five days. There were improvements in acquisition behaviour and mood, while no adverse effects were observed. While a single case cannot establish efficacy, this report suggests that neuromodulation may offer new possibilities for people with limited therapeutic options.Together, these five contributions illustrate how neuroimaging and neuromodulation, applied independently or in combination, can advance psychiatric research from multiple perspectives. As the technologies continue to mature, they will offer increasingly precise ways to understand, diagnose, and treat psychiatric disorders.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US), Aarhus University (DK), University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.