Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C‐Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction

ABSTRACT Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C‐suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in‐flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces transformation friction and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C‐suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Journal
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.70028
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C‐Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction

N. Smith, Andrew Burton‐Jones
Information Systems Journal
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C‐Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction

N. Smith, Andrew Burton‐Jones
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C‐suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in‐flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces transformation friction and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C‐suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.

Information Systems Journal
Department of the Treasury (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.