Effectiveness of coordination in humanitarian water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) response: evidence from a mixed-methods evaluation of outcomes and outputs across five national coordination platforms

We found that incorporating the ToC into the Minimum Requirements successfully supported humanitarian WASH responses. Additionally, while staffing levels are necessary to achieve response outputs and outcomes, they are not sufficient. Other factors, such as poor funding, inadequate monitoring and evaluation, and a need for localization, also impacted response outputs and outcomes. In a time of reduced humanitarian funding, investment in Global WASH Cluster coordination has shown to enhance response outputs and outcomes. Recommendations include dedicating staffing, developing standardized monitoring and assessment tools, strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration, and continuing accountability to affected populations. Further research on monitoring and evaluation, funding, affected population needs, and sub-national coordination is indicated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict and Health
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-026-00756-7
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of coordination in humanitarian water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) response: evidence from a mixed-methods evaluation of outcomes and outputs across five national coordination platforms

C. Cunningham, Daniele Lantagne, Monica Ramos, Daniel P. Nguyen et al.
Conflict and Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Effectiveness of coordination in humanitarian water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) response: evidence from a mixed-methods evaluation of outcomes and outputs across five national coordination platforms

C. Cunningham, Daniele Lantagne, Monica Ramos, Daniel P. Nguyen, Camille Heylen, Aliocha Salagnac
article en

Abstract

We found that incorporating the ToC into the Minimum Requirements successfully supported humanitarian WASH responses. Additionally, while staffing levels are necessary to achieve response outputs and outcomes, they are not sufficient. Other factors, such as poor funding, inadequate monitoring and evaluation, and a need for localization, also impacted response outputs and outcomes. In a time of reduced humanitarian funding, investment in Global WASH Cluster coordination has shown to enhance response outputs and outcomes. Recommendations include dedicating staffing, developing standardized monitoring and assessment tools, strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration, and continuing accountability to affected populations. Further research on monitoring and evaluation, funding, affected population needs, and sub-national coordination is indicated.

Conflict and HealthVol. 20(1)
Tufts University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Innovation Cluster (Canada) (CA), Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.