Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal

Abstract Pathways consistent with global climate objectives typically deploy billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from land-intensive methods such as forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Such large-scale deployment of land-intensive CDR may have negative consequences for biodiversity. Here we assess scenarios across five integrated assessment models and show that scenarios consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C allocate up to 13% of global areas of high biodiversity importance for land-intensive CDR. These overlaps are distributed unevenly, with higher shares in low- and middle-income countries. Understanding the potential conflicts between climate action and biodiversity conservation is crucial. An illustrative analysis shows that if current biodiversity hotspots were protected from land-use change, over half the land allocated for forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the assessed scenarios would be unavailable unless synergies between climate and conservation goals are leveraged. Our analysis also indicates CDR-related biodiversity benefits due to avoided warming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal

Gaurav Ganti, Jonathan Doelman, Rachel Warren, Ruben Prütz et al.
Nature Climate Change
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal

Gaurav Ganti, Jonathan Doelman, Rachel Warren, Ruben Prütz, Joeri Rogelj, Yazhen Wu, Petr Havlík, Florian Humpenöder, Nicole Forstenhäusler, Michael Wögerer, Alex Popp, Stefan Frank, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Vassilis Daioglou, Sabine Fuss, Tomoko Hasegawa, Tamás Krisztin, Jeff Price, Florian Kraxner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pathways consistent with global climate objectives typically deploy billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from land-intensive methods such as forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Such large-scale deployment of land-intensive CDR may have negative consequences for biodiversity. Here we assess scenarios across five integrated assessment models and show that scenarios consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C allocate up to 13% of global areas of high biodiversity importance for land-intensive CDR. These overlaps are distributed unevenly, with higher shares in low- and middle-income countries. Understanding the potential conflicts between climate action and biodiversity conservation is crucial. An illustrative analysis shows that if current biodiversity hotspots were protected from land-use change, over half the land allocated for forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the assessed scenarios would be unavailable unless synergies between climate and conservation goals are leveraged. Our analysis also indicates CDR-related biodiversity benefits due to avoided warming.

Nature Climate ChangeVol. 16(2)
University of Kassel (DE), University of East Anglia (GB), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Ritsumeikan University (JP), Utrecht University (NL), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Leibniz Association (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Tyndall Centre (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), BOKU University (AT)
European Commission, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.