Improving the value of population health data for health policy and decision-making using machine learning algorithms in EQ-5D-5L index estimation

This study aimed to estimate patient-level EQ-5D-5L index scores using routinely collected sociodemographic and Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) data from seven extensive population surveys (N = 9,324). Fourteen machine learning (ML) models were compared in five research scenarios using the recently developed G score. Based on the performance ranking shown across scenarios, AdaBoost emerged as the best model (mean rank 2.87), followed by Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and XGBoost (mean ranks 2.94 and 3.60, respectively). AdaBoost achieved the best results when no imputation was done and both sociodemographic and MEHM data were included (G = 0.955), but its performance declined when the estimation was based solely on sociodemographics (G = 0.871). The results confirm that the EQ-5D-5L index can be well predicted from existing statistical data using ML methods and that the MEHM improves the estimation. Our findings also highlight the potentially undesirable effects of data imputation in ML-based estimations. The methods presented in this study enhance the usability of existing health data, giving analysts and decision-makers a practical way to populate health-economic evaluations when primary data collection is impractical or impossible. Nonetheless, even advanced ML algorithms have limitations, so direct EQ-5D-5L data collection should remain the preferred approach whenever feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32123-6
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the value of population health data for health policy and decision-making using machine learning algorithms in EQ-5D-5L index estimation

Levente Kovács, Áron Hölgyesi, M Péntek, Mehdi Neshat et al.
Scientific Reports
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Improving the value of population health data for health policy and decision-making using machine learning algorithms in EQ-5D-5L index estimation

Levente Kovács, Áron Hölgyesi, M Péntek, Mehdi Neshat, Viktor Jáger, Zsombor Zrubka, László Gulàcsi, Áron Kincses, Seyedali Mirjalili
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate patient-level EQ-5D-5L index scores using routinely collected sociodemographic and Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) data from seven extensive population surveys (N = 9,324). Fourteen machine learning (ML) models were compared in five research scenarios using the recently developed G score. Based on the performance ranking shown across scenarios, AdaBoost emerged as the best model (mean rank 2.87), followed by Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and XGBoost (mean ranks 2.94 and 3.60, respectively). AdaBoost achieved the best results when no imputation was done and both sociodemographic and MEHM data were included (G = 0.955), but its performance declined when the estimation was based solely on sociodemographics (G = 0.871). The results confirm that the EQ-5D-5L index can be well predicted from existing statistical data using ML methods and that the MEHM improves the estimation. Our findings also highlight the potentially undesirable effects of data imputation in ML-based estimations. The methods presented in this study enhance the usability of existing health data, giving analysts and decision-makers a practical way to populate health-economic evaluations when primary data collection is impractical or impossible. Nonetheless, even advanced ML algorithms have limitations, so direct EQ-5D-5L data collection should remain the preferred approach whenever feasible.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Obuda University (HU), Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HU), University of Miskolc (HU), Torrens University Australia (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.