Buying Silence: Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea and Chinese Aid Allocation Patterns for Target Countries

Abstract How does China strategically allocate foreign aid to increase its influence on South China Sea disputes? We posit that China uses foreign aid as a tool of strategic appeasement to manage militarized interstate disputes, particularly targeting claimant states with smaller winning coalitions that are more susceptible to aid influence. The results of our empirical analysis show that China is more likely to allocate aid to the ASEAN SCS claimants with a smaller winning coalition. These findings not only support the notion of foreign aid as a strategic tool employed by China to mitigate tensions in the South China Sea but also highlight the vulnerability of certain recipient states. This article contributes to the foreign assistance and conflict literature by examining the conditionality of claimant donors’ decisions to provide foreign aid to other claimant recipients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of East Asian Studies
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2025.10018
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buying Silence: Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea and Chinese Aid Allocation Patterns for Target Countries

Jinwon Lee, Moonyoung Kim, Jaeseok Cho
Journal of East Asian Studies
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Buying Silence: Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea and Chinese Aid Allocation Patterns for Target Countries

Jinwon Lee, Moonyoung Kim, Jaeseok Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract How does China strategically allocate foreign aid to increase its influence on South China Sea disputes? We posit that China uses foreign aid as a tool of strategic appeasement to manage militarized interstate disputes, particularly targeting claimant states with smaller winning coalitions that are more susceptible to aid influence. The results of our empirical analysis show that China is more likely to allocate aid to the ASEAN SCS claimants with a smaller winning coalition. These findings not only support the notion of foreign aid as a strategic tool employed by China to mitigate tensions in the South China Sea but also highlight the vulnerability of certain recipient states. This article contributes to the foreign assistance and conflict literature by examining the conditionality of claimant donors’ decisions to provide foreign aid to other claimant recipients.

Journal of East Asian StudiesVol. 26(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.