Sex Differences in Response to Viral Vector Vaccines—Implications for Future Vaccine Design

Vaccination represents one of the most impactful public health achievements, preventing 3.5 to 5 million deaths annually according to estimates of the World Health Organization. Yet, recent outbreaks of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases highlight the need for rapid and strategic vaccine development using vaccine platforms technologies. Sexual dimorphism in vaccine-induced immune responses has received significant attention in recent years. To ensure vaccine safety and efficacy across sexes, sex-based differences should be considered in vaccine design, dosing, and regimen. Evidence on many traditional vaccines, such as the inactivated influenza vaccine, shows a female bias in innate and adaptive immune responses following vaccination. Thus, it has long been suggested that females universally develop stronger humoral and cellular immune responses to vaccines compared to males. However, compared to traditional vaccines, studies investigating sex differences following vaccination with next-generation platforms, such as viral vector vaccines, remain limited. This review provides an overview of clinical observations of sex differences in responses to replication-competent and replication-deficient, recombinant and nonrecombinant viral vaccines. Additionally, we describe the current state of knowledge on mechanisms of sex-based differences in immune responses and possible implications for future vaccine design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Immunological Reviews
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.70098
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Response to Viral Vector Vaccines—Implications for Future Vaccine Design

Ilka Grewe, Tamara Zoran, M M Addo
Immunological Reviews
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Sex Differences in Response to Viral Vector Vaccines—Implications for Future Vaccine Design

Ilka Grewe, Tamara Zoran, M M Addo
article en

Abstract

Vaccination represents one of the most impactful public health achievements, preventing 3.5 to 5 million deaths annually according to estimates of the World Health Organization. Yet, recent outbreaks of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases highlight the need for rapid and strategic vaccine development using vaccine platforms technologies. Sexual dimorphism in vaccine-induced immune responses has received significant attention in recent years. To ensure vaccine safety and efficacy across sexes, sex-based differences should be considered in vaccine design, dosing, and regimen. Evidence on many traditional vaccines, such as the inactivated influenza vaccine, shows a female bias in innate and adaptive immune responses following vaccination. Thus, it has long been suggested that females universally develop stronger humoral and cellular immune responses to vaccines compared to males. However, compared to traditional vaccines, studies investigating sex differences following vaccination with next-generation platforms, such as viral vector vaccines, remain limited. This review provides an overview of clinical observations of sex differences in responses to replication-competent and replication-deficient, recombinant and nonrecombinant viral vaccines. Additionally, we describe the current state of knowledge on mechanisms of sex-based differences in immune responses and possible implications for future vaccine design.

Immunological ReviewsVol. 338(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), German Center for Infection Research (DE), Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.