Situating collaborative disciplinary activity: creating a space for high-quality group engagement

This research investigates interrelated dimensions, dynamics, and context influences of group disciplinary engagement (GDE). Quality ratings were assigned for five GDE dimensions to 2.5-minute segments, from video drawn from three different middle school science and mathematics curriculum contexts. Dynamic structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the interrelationships and changes in group engagement quality and the role of contextual moderators. Results indicated positive interrelations among all engagement dimensions, save socioemotional engagement, suggesting a mutually supportive relationship. Temporally, disciplinary engagement (DE) had a key role as a positive predictor of collaborative, disciplinary, and behavioral engagement. Open tasks were associated with higher DE, while simulations fostered metacognitive engagement. This study has implications for understanding the complexity of GDE patterns as contextually situated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Instructional Science
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09772-1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situating collaborative disciplinary activity: creating a space for high-quality group engagement

Toni Kempler Rogat, Anne Traynor, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silve, Britte Haugan Cheng
Instructional Science
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Situating collaborative disciplinary activity: creating a space for high-quality group engagement

Toni Kempler Rogat, Anne Traynor, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silve, Britte Haugan Cheng
article en

Abstract

This research investigates interrelated dimensions, dynamics, and context influences of group disciplinary engagement (GDE). Quality ratings were assigned for five GDE dimensions to 2.5-minute segments, from video drawn from three different middle school science and mathematics curriculum contexts. Dynamic structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the interrelationships and changes in group engagement quality and the role of contextual moderators. Results indicated positive interrelations among all engagement dimensions, save socioemotional engagement, suggesting a mutually supportive relationship. Temporally, disciplinary engagement (DE) had a key role as a positive predictor of collaborative, disciplinary, and behavioral engagement. Open tasks were associated with higher DE, while simulations fostered metacognitive engagement. This study has implications for understanding the complexity of GDE patterns as contextually situated.

Instructional ScienceVol. 54(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Menlo School (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.