From inherent capacities to resilient systems: a multi-dimensional framework for assessing health system resilience

The concept of health system resilience has gained increasing importance as countries seek to improve their preparedness for unexpected events, ensuring both effective response and the continuity of essential health services. However, assessing resilience remains challenging due to the complex and interconnected nature of health systems. This study proposes a Health System Resilience Assessment Framework (HSRAF) to conceptualize and evaluate resilience through a systems-thinking approach. The framework is structured around the system’s inherent capacities, which constitute the foundational resources, structures, and characteristics that enable normal functioning and, when challenged, trigger the activation of adaptive capacities. Inherent capacities refer to the conditions that support regular Service Delivery, whereas adaptive capacities enable the system to reorganize and maintain essential functions during crises. The framework incorporates nine key indicators: Human Resources, Physical Resources, Medical Products, Information, Financing, Service Delivery, Health Status, Health Risks and Governance. To examine the interconnections among these indicators, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted. The Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was applied to identify causal relationships and influence levels among indicators. The DEMATEL analysis revealed that Service Delivery (0.128) is the most critical indicator for health system resilience, followed by Financing (0.124), Governance (0.116), Health Status (0.110), Human Resources (0.108), Information (0.106), Health Risks (0.104), Physical Resources (0.102), and Medical Products (0.100). The results also identified Governance, Financing, and Information as the most influential dimensions on health systems resilience. The findings highlight the pivotal role of Service Delivery, Financing, and Governance in strengthening health system resilience. The DEMATEL-based framework captures both the relative weights and directional influences among indicators. This provides policy makers with an analytical tool to explore alternative scenarios and enhance the preparedness, response, and recovery capacities of health systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14027-x
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From inherent capacities to resilient systems: a multi-dimensional framework for assessing health system resilience

Sabahattin Aydın, Hakan Tozan, Kübra Çakır, Almula Melis et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

From inherent capacities to resilient systems: a multi-dimensional framework for assessing health system resilience

Sabahattin Aydın, Hakan Tozan, Kübra Çakır, Almula Melis, Özgür Erol
article en

Abstract

The concept of health system resilience has gained increasing importance as countries seek to improve their preparedness for unexpected events, ensuring both effective response and the continuity of essential health services. However, assessing resilience remains challenging due to the complex and interconnected nature of health systems. This study proposes a Health System Resilience Assessment Framework (HSRAF) to conceptualize and evaluate resilience through a systems-thinking approach. The framework is structured around the system’s inherent capacities, which constitute the foundational resources, structures, and characteristics that enable normal functioning and, when challenged, trigger the activation of adaptive capacities. Inherent capacities refer to the conditions that support regular Service Delivery, whereas adaptive capacities enable the system to reorganize and maintain essential functions during crises. The framework incorporates nine key indicators: Human Resources, Physical Resources, Medical Products, Information, Financing, Service Delivery, Health Status, Health Risks and Governance. To examine the interconnections among these indicators, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted. The Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was applied to identify causal relationships and influence levels among indicators. The DEMATEL analysis revealed that Service Delivery (0.128) is the most critical indicator for health system resilience, followed by Financing (0.124), Governance (0.116), Health Status (0.110), Human Resources (0.108), Information (0.106), Health Risks (0.104), Physical Resources (0.102), and Medical Products (0.100). The results also identified Governance, Financing, and Information as the most influential dimensions on health systems resilience. The findings highlight the pivotal role of Service Delivery, Financing, and Governance in strengthening health system resilience. The DEMATEL-based framework captures both the relative weights and directional influences among indicators. This provides policy makers with an analytical tool to explore alternative scenarios and enhance the preparedness, response, and recovery capacities of health systems.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
American University of the Middle East (KW), Istanbul Medipol University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.