Upper hemisternotomy vs. full sternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement

Low morbidity and mortality demonstrate that UHS for combined hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement is safe and feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1646209
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upper hemisternotomy vs. full sternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement

Murray Zucker, Christopher Pritting, Jacqueline McGee, Colin King et al.
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

Upper hemisternotomy vs. full sternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement

Murray Zucker, Christopher Pritting, Jacqueline McGee, Colin King, Vishal N. Shah, Konstadinos Plestis, Joshua R. Chen, Megary McCoy
article en

Abstract

Low morbidity and mortality demonstrate that UHS for combined hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement is safe and feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 12
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.