A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture

Aquatic animal products are vital to global food security and nutrition, necessitating accurate, scalable, and non-destructive methods for quality assessment in aquaculture. Conventional techniques such as dissection and biochemical analysis are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for real-time or high-throughput decision-making. This review synthesizes six major categories of non-destructive technologies—electrical, spectroscopic, natural sensory, acoustic, radiographic, and infrared and microwave—classified by their underlying sensing mechanisms and therefore differing measurement capabilities and deployment feasibilities. To support objective technology selection, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework was developed using general performance criteria (cost, accuracy, speed, usability) and one decision-critical application-specific criterion (non-invasiveness), and was demonstrated for ovarian maturation staging in mud crabs by ranking 19 candidate techniques. Accuracy had the highest weight (0.416), but non-invasiveness (0.224) and usability (0.197) substantially influenced the final ranking, illustrating how operational and welfare constraints could shift preferred solutions despite differences in analytical accuracy. Based on the global priority weights (GA), computer vision (CV) was identified as the most suitable option (GA = 0.076), balancing affordability, throughput, ease of deployment, and animal welfare compatibility, whereas high-end modalities such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR; GA = 0.073) and computed tomography (CT; GA = 0.070) were constrained by cost and operational complexity. Overall, this review–AHP–case study pipeline provides a transparent and reproducible decision-support basis for selecting non-destructive technologies across aquaculture species and quality targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture Journal
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture

Supapan Chaiprapat, Kunlapat Thongkaew, Guoxiang Huang
Aquaculture Journal
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture

Supapan Chaiprapat, Kunlapat Thongkaew, Guoxiang Huang
article en

Abstract

Aquatic animal products are vital to global food security and nutrition, necessitating accurate, scalable, and non-destructive methods for quality assessment in aquaculture. Conventional techniques such as dissection and biochemical analysis are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for real-time or high-throughput decision-making. This review synthesizes six major categories of non-destructive technologies—electrical, spectroscopic, natural sensory, acoustic, radiographic, and infrared and microwave—classified by their underlying sensing mechanisms and therefore differing measurement capabilities and deployment feasibilities. To support objective technology selection, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework was developed using general performance criteria (cost, accuracy, speed, usability) and one decision-critical application-specific criterion (non-invasiveness), and was demonstrated for ovarian maturation staging in mud crabs by ranking 19 candidate techniques. Accuracy had the highest weight (0.416), but non-invasiveness (0.224) and usability (0.197) substantially influenced the final ranking, illustrating how operational and welfare constraints could shift preferred solutions despite differences in analytical accuracy. Based on the global priority weights (GA), computer vision (CV) was identified as the most suitable option (GA = 0.076), balancing affordability, throughput, ease of deployment, and animal welfare compatibility, whereas high-end modalities such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR; GA = 0.073) and computed tomography (CT; GA = 0.070) were constrained by cost and operational complexity. Overall, this review–AHP–case study pipeline provides a transparent and reproducible decision-support basis for selecting non-destructive technologies across aquaculture species and quality targets.

Aquaculture JournalVol. 6(1)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.