ARTHAPATTI: THE LOGIC OF PRESUMPTION IN INDIAN PHILOSOPHY

Arthapatti, or presumption, is a distinct epistemological tool in Indian philosophy, recognized in traditions like Vedanta and Mimamsa. It serves as an independent means of acquiring knowledge when neither direct perception (pratyakṣa) nor inference (anumana) can fully explain a situation. Arthapatti operates by postulating an unseen fact to account for an observable reality, making it crucial in philosophical debates, logical analysis, and even Ayurvedic reasoning. It is categorized into Drstarthapatti (based on direct observation) and Srutarthapatti (derived from verbal testimony). Unlike inference, Arthapatti does not rely on a universal causal connection but rather on contextual necessity. This method is widely applied in diagnosing and reasoning within Ayurveda and scientific inquiry, offering a logical bridge between known and unknown phenomena. Its relevance highlights the adaptability of Indian epistemological frameworks in both abstract thought and practical application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18427403
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARTHAPATTI: THE LOGIC OF PRESUMPTION IN INDIAN PHILOSOPHY

Kamlesh Kumar Sharma2 Ritika Yogi1*
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

ARTHAPATTI: THE LOGIC OF PRESUMPTION IN INDIAN PHILOSOPHY

Kamlesh Kumar Sharma2 Ritika Yogi1*
article en

Abstract

Arthapatti, or presumption, is a distinct epistemological tool in Indian philosophy, recognized in traditions like Vedanta and Mimamsa. It serves as an independent means of acquiring knowledge when neither direct perception (pratyakṣa) nor inference (anumana) can fully explain a situation. Arthapatti operates by postulating an unseen fact to account for an observable reality, making it crucial in philosophical debates, logical analysis, and even Ayurvedic reasoning. It is categorized into Drstarthapatti (based on direct observation) and Srutarthapatti (derived from verbal testimony). Unlike inference, Arthapatti does not rely on a universal causal connection but rather on contextual necessity. This method is widely applied in diagnosing and reasoning within Ayurveda and scientific inquiry, offering a logical bridge between known and unknown phenomena. Its relevance highlights the adaptability of Indian epistemological frameworks in both abstract thought and practical application.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.