Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process

The process of designing national policy is complicated and impacted by both political and rational analysis. The conflict between politics and reason in policymaking is examined in this essay, with an emphasis on how these forces influence choices, priorities, and results. This study uses a comparative case study technique to investigate cases where political variables compromised or influenced the rational design of policies, drawing on theoretical frameworks from behavioural economics, political science, and public policy. The results provide light on the inherent trade-offs between political expediency and evidence-based decision-making, guiding academics, decision-makers, and practitioners attempting to overcome these obstacles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18436778
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
article en

Abstract

The process of designing national policy is complicated and impacted by both political and rational analysis. The conflict between politics and reason in policymaking is examined in this essay, with an emphasis on how these forces influence choices, priorities, and results. This study uses a comparative case study technique to investigate cases where political variables compromised or influenced the rational design of policies, drawing on theoretical frameworks from behavioural economics, political science, and public policy. The results provide light on the inherent trade-offs between political expediency and evidence-based decision-making, guiding academics, decision-makers, and practitioners attempting to overcome these obstacles.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leading University (BD), Discovery Centre (CA), Legal Aid New South Wales (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process — Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS