Moving against inertia, friction, gravity: different modalities, same consequences on animals’ propulsive force capacities

The ability to generate propulsive force at different velocities is essential for animal locomotion but has often been depreciated. This study explored animals' locomotion under varying mechanical constraints by addressing whether force capacities measured during accelerations on level ground are representative of propulsion capacities exerted during steady velocity uphill running or running against a resistance. We hypothesised that locomotion against resistances induced by inertia, friction or gravity would lead to similar propulsive force capacities, step length, and step frequency. Nineteen human-participants performed 3 accelerated, 6 resisted, and 10 uphill sprints while their instantaneous velocity, step length, and step frequency were measured. The propulsive force capacities decreased linearly with velocity. This individual relationship was preserved among the disparate mechanical constraints, humans just shifting along this curve. Trivial (-2.0±21.7%, p=0.43) and small differences (-6.1±21.5%, p=0.24), and positive correlation (p<0.001) where indeed found between force capacities at similar velocities among uphill/accelerated (r=0.94) and resisted/accelerated (r=0.91) conditions, respectively. Spatio-temporal variables did not differ between conditions (<2%). Conducting similar analysis in a 12-animals dataset from the literature revealed that different experimental modalities are associated with similar propulsive force-velocity relationships within the same species. Extending the analogy between accelerated, uphill, and resisted running to the animal kingdom enabled comparisons between species based on propulsive force capacities and allometric scaling. Using humans as an experimental paradigm, we provided a framework for interpreting how environmental stressors affect movement strategies in many terrestrial species. In sports science, this study opens practical implications for the design of training and research protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251127
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving against inertia, friction, gravity: different modalities, same consequences on animals’ propulsive force capacities

Mylène Vonderscher, Baptiste Morel, Pierre Samozino, Maximilien Bowen et al.
Journal of Experimental Biology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Moving against inertia, friction, gravity: different modalities, same consequences on animals’ propulsive force capacities

Mylène Vonderscher, Baptiste Morel, Pierre Samozino, Maximilien Bowen, Pablo Rozier-Delgado, J-B. Morin
article en

Abstract

The ability to generate propulsive force at different velocities is essential for animal locomotion but has often been depreciated. This study explored animals' locomotion under varying mechanical constraints by addressing whether force capacities measured during accelerations on level ground are representative of propulsion capacities exerted during steady velocity uphill running or running against a resistance. We hypothesised that locomotion against resistances induced by inertia, friction or gravity would lead to similar propulsive force capacities, step length, and step frequency. Nineteen human-participants performed 3 accelerated, 6 resisted, and 10 uphill sprints while their instantaneous velocity, step length, and step frequency were measured. The propulsive force capacities decreased linearly with velocity. This individual relationship was preserved among the disparate mechanical constraints, humans just shifting along this curve. Trivial (-2.0±21.7%, p=0.43) and small differences (-6.1±21.5%, p=0.24), and positive correlation (p<0.001) where indeed found between force capacities at similar velocities among uphill/accelerated (r=0.94) and resisted/accelerated (r=0.91) conditions, respectively. Spatio-temporal variables did not differ between conditions (<2%). Conducting similar analysis in a 12-animals dataset from the literature revealed that different experimental modalities are associated with similar propulsive force-velocity relationships within the same species. Extending the analogy between accelerated, uphill, and resisted running to the animal kingdom enabled comparisons between species based on propulsive force capacities and allometric scaling. Using humans as an experimental paradigm, we provided a framework for interpreting how environmental stressors affect movement strategies in many terrestrial species. In sports science, this study opens practical implications for the design of training and research protocols.

Journal of Experimental Biology
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.