Quality of Place in Rural Maine: The Way Life Should Be

This paper examines quality of place across Maine counties, with a focus on differences between rural and urban areas and comparisons to all US counties. A wide range of factors are considered, including climate (e.g., January temperature), natural features (e.g., percentage of area covered by water), the location of arts and recreation businesses (e.g., museums, skiing facilities, and marinas), services (e.g., healthcare and childcare), housing costs, local economic opportunities (e.g., job growth) and population density. Results show that several Maine counties rate high nationally for natural features, arts and recreation, healthcare and childcare services, and low population densities. However, people and places face significant tradeoffs when considering these different aspects of an area’s quality of place. The study finds that attempts to enhance a region’s quality of place need to recognize that individual preferences vary widely and actions that benefit one group may not align with the interests of others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maine policy review
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53558/xbtm5938
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Place in Rural Maine: The Way Life Should Be

Todd Gabe
Maine policy review
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

Quality of Place in Rural Maine: The Way Life Should Be

Todd Gabe
article en

Abstract

This paper examines quality of place across Maine counties, with a focus on differences between rural and urban areas and comparisons to all US counties. A wide range of factors are considered, including climate (e.g., January temperature), natural features (e.g., percentage of area covered by water), the location of arts and recreation businesses (e.g., museums, skiing facilities, and marinas), services (e.g., healthcare and childcare), housing costs, local economic opportunities (e.g., job growth) and population density. Results show that several Maine counties rate high nationally for natural features, arts and recreation, healthcare and childcare services, and low population densities. However, people and places face significant tradeoffs when considering these different aspects of an area’s quality of place. The study finds that attempts to enhance a region’s quality of place need to recognize that individual preferences vary widely and actions that benefit one group may not align with the interests of others.

Maine policy reviewVol. 34(2)
University of Maine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quality of Place in Rural Maine: The Way Life Should Be — Todd Gabe · Maine policy review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS