Applying the New Inflammation Criterion Impairs GLIM Validity in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Medical Conditions

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recently updated its inflammation criterion through a Delphi consensus to standardize its assessment. This study aimed to assess the impact of these new recommendations on the concurrent and predictive validity of the GLIM criteria in hospitalized medical patients. <b>Methods</b>: This post hoc analysis re-evaluated a previously published cohort of 119 hospitalized patients with acute medical conditions, originally assessed using the GLIM criteria and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) as the reference standard. Inflammation was redefined according to the 2024 GLIM Delphi consensus, and the concurrent and predictive validity of the modified GLIM criteria (GLIM-I) were examined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the discriminative ability of SGA, original GLIM, and GLIM-I to predict prolonged hospital stay. <b>Results</b>: With the updated inflammation definition, all patients met the etiologic criterion, increasing malnutrition prevalence from 41.7% to 52.2%. GLIM-I showed a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 67.7% versus SGA, not reaching the predefined ≥80% threshold for concurrent validity. Predictive validity was maintained (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.40; 95% CI: 1.31-8.83). SGA achieved the highest discriminative ability (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.693-0.874), significantly outperforming the original GLIM (AUC = 0.723; 95% CI: 0.616-0.830; <i>p</i> = 0.049). GLIM-I showed similar performance (AUC = 0.731; 95% CI: 0.620-0.843; <i>p</i> = 0.727). <b>Conclusions</b>: SGA should continue to be considered the method of choice for nutritional diagnosis in hospitalized medical patients. Further research is needed to determine how the new inflammation criteria influence the validity of the GLIM framework in other clinical contexts before their widespread implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030462
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the New Inflammation Criterion Impairs GLIM Validity in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Medical Conditions

Silvia Toro, Á. Alcoba Pérez, Laia Fontané, Araceli Estepa et al.
Nutrients
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Applying the New Inflammation Criterion Impairs GLIM Validity in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Medical Conditions

Silvia Toro, Á. Alcoba Pérez, Laia Fontané, Araceli Estepa, Miriam Herranz, Humberto Navarro, Maria Helena Reig, J Pedro‐Botet, Gemma Llauradó, Juan José Chillarón, Maria Antonia Roig, David Benaiges
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recently updated its inflammation criterion through a Delphi consensus to standardize its assessment. This study aimed to assess the impact of these new recommendations on the concurrent and predictive validity of the GLIM criteria in hospitalized medical patients. <b>Methods</b>: This post hoc analysis re-evaluated a previously published cohort of 119 hospitalized patients with acute medical conditions, originally assessed using the GLIM criteria and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) as the reference standard. Inflammation was redefined according to the 2024 GLIM Delphi consensus, and the concurrent and predictive validity of the modified GLIM criteria (GLIM-I) were examined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the discriminative ability of SGA, original GLIM, and GLIM-I to predict prolonged hospital stay. <b>Results</b>: With the updated inflammation definition, all patients met the etiologic criterion, increasing malnutrition prevalence from 41.7% to 52.2%. GLIM-I showed a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 67.7% versus SGA, not reaching the predefined ≥80% threshold for concurrent validity. Predictive validity was maintained (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.40; 95% CI: 1.31-8.83). SGA achieved the highest discriminative ability (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.693-0.874), significantly outperforming the original GLIM (AUC = 0.723; 95% CI: 0.616-0.830; <i>p</i> = 0.049). GLIM-I showed similar performance (AUC = 0.731; 95% CI: 0.620-0.843; <i>p</i> = 0.727). <b>Conclusions</b>: SGA should continue to be considered the method of choice for nutritional diagnosis in hospitalized medical patients. Further research is needed to determine how the new inflammation criteria influence the validity of the GLIM framework in other clinical contexts before their widespread implementation.

NutrientsVol. 18(3)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (ES), Consorci Sanitari Garraf (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.