Aligning development and climate goals: The role of poverty in household mitigation strategies

Abstract Motivation Climate change remains one of the most pressing global challenges, one which is driven largely by human activity. While countries, including Ghana, have made commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of global warming are already being felt. For many low‐income populations, particularly those facing multiple deprivations, climate action may not be a priority. Understanding how poverty in its various dimensions intersects with household‐level climate mitigation is crucial for designing inclusive environmental and development policies. Purpose This study explores the relationship between multidimensional poverty and climate mitigation behaviours in Ghana. It seeks to answer the following questions: (1) How does multidimensional poverty affect the likelihood of adopting climate mitigation strategies at the household level? (2) Are there gender and locational differences in climate action among poor households? Approach and Methods The study uses nationally representative panel data for Ghana. A multidimensional poverty index (MDPI) is constructed based on indicators defined by the Ghana Statistical Service and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). A correlated random‐effects (CRE) probit model is applied to examine the link between poverty and household‐level climate mitigation behaviours. Findings Households headed by males and those in urban areas are more likely to adopt clean, mitigative strategies. In contrast, multidimensional poverty is consistently associated with a lower likelihood of climate mitigation. Deprivation in areas such as health, education and living standards may push climate concerns down household priority lists. However, poor households in urban areas are more likely to engage in climate mitigation than their rural counterparts, suggesting a locational advantage. Policy Implications Effective climate policies must account for social and spatial inequalities. Integrating poverty reduction with climate action, especially through improved access to basic services, can enhance the adoption of mitigation strategies, ensuring no one is left behind in the climate transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development Policy Review
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70060
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aligning development and climate goals: The role of poverty in household mitigation strategies

Nkechi S. Owoo
Development Policy Review
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Aligning development and climate goals: The role of poverty in household mitigation strategies

Nkechi S. Owoo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Motivation Climate change remains one of the most pressing global challenges, one which is driven largely by human activity. While countries, including Ghana, have made commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of global warming are already being felt. For many low‐income populations, particularly those facing multiple deprivations, climate action may not be a priority. Understanding how poverty in its various dimensions intersects with household‐level climate mitigation is crucial for designing inclusive environmental and development policies. Purpose This study explores the relationship between multidimensional poverty and climate mitigation behaviours in Ghana. It seeks to answer the following questions: (1) How does multidimensional poverty affect the likelihood of adopting climate mitigation strategies at the household level? (2) Are there gender and locational differences in climate action among poor households? Approach and Methods The study uses nationally representative panel data for Ghana. A multidimensional poverty index (MDPI) is constructed based on indicators defined by the Ghana Statistical Service and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). A correlated random‐effects (CRE) probit model is applied to examine the link between poverty and household‐level climate mitigation behaviours. Findings Households headed by males and those in urban areas are more likely to adopt clean, mitigative strategies. In contrast, multidimensional poverty is consistently associated with a lower likelihood of climate mitigation. Deprivation in areas such as health, education and living standards may push climate concerns down household priority lists. However, poor households in urban areas are more likely to engage in climate mitigation than their rural counterparts, suggesting a locational advantage. Policy Implications Effective climate policies must account for social and spatial inequalities. Integrating poverty reduction with climate action, especially through improved access to basic services, can enhance the adoption of mitigation strategies, ensuring no one is left behind in the climate transition.

Development Policy ReviewVol. 44(2)
University of Ghana (GH), World Bank Group (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.