Balancing Tariff Protection and Free Trade: A Comparative Political Economy Study Across Developed, Developing, and Poor Countries

National Seminar War and Tariff: Revisiting Globalization in a Fragmented World Order - Department of Political Science & School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Central University of Haryana This paper examines why tariff protection and free trade strategies vary systematically across developed, developing, and poor economies. The study challenges the assumption that trade liberalisation or protectionism reflects ideological preference, arguing instead that trade behaviour is structurally determined by economic capability, institutional strength, and developmental stage. Using a comparative qualitative methodology grounded in secondary data from the WTO, UNCTAD, WITS, IMF, and World Bank, the research evaluates tariff patterns across three country groups through analytical categories including industrial maturity, market size, technological autonomy, political economy dynamics, and welfare capacity. The findings reveal that developed economies maintain broadly liberal trade regimes but apply targeted tariffs to preserve geopolitical power, protect strategic industries, and support influential domestic lobbying sectors. Developing economies adopt hybrid models, combining infant industry protection, import management, and gradual liberalisation to secure employment, technological upgrading, and foreign investment. Poor economies rely on tariffs primarily for fiscal survival, facing structural and institutional limitations that restrict their capacity to use trade policy as a developmental tool. Overall, the study demonstrates that tariff–free trade balance is not uniform or ideology-driven, but a function of each country group’s structural conditions: developed states protect power, developing states protect growth, and poor states protect survival. These insights broaden understanding of global trade diversity and offer direction for policy design and future empirical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18444175
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Tariff Protection and Free Trade: A Comparative Political Economy Study Across Developed, Developing, and Poor Countries

Amit Sharma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global trade and economics
article

Balancing Tariff Protection and Free Trade: A Comparative Political Economy Study Across Developed, Developing, and Poor Countries

Amit Sharma
article en

Abstract

National Seminar War and Tariff: Revisiting Globalization in a Fragmented World Order - Department of Political Science & School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Central University of Haryana This paper examines why tariff protection and free trade strategies vary systematically across developed, developing, and poor economies. The study challenges the assumption that trade liberalisation or protectionism reflects ideological preference, arguing instead that trade behaviour is structurally determined by economic capability, institutional strength, and developmental stage. Using a comparative qualitative methodology grounded in secondary data from the WTO, UNCTAD, WITS, IMF, and World Bank, the research evaluates tariff patterns across three country groups through analytical categories including industrial maturity, market size, technological autonomy, political economy dynamics, and welfare capacity. The findings reveal that developed economies maintain broadly liberal trade regimes but apply targeted tariffs to preserve geopolitical power, protect strategic industries, and support influential domestic lobbying sectors. Developing economies adopt hybrid models, combining infant industry protection, import management, and gradual liberalisation to secure employment, technological upgrading, and foreign investment. Poor economies rely on tariffs primarily for fiscal survival, facing structural and institutional limitations that restrict their capacity to use trade policy as a developmental tool. Overall, the study demonstrates that tariff–free trade balance is not uniform or ideology-driven, but a function of each country group’s structural conditions: developed states protect power, developing states protect growth, and poor states protect survival. These insights broaden understanding of global trade diversity and offer direction for policy design and future empirical research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.