Deployment Capacity and Juridstictional Boundaries for Agentic AI: A Legal and Ecological Homeostasis Framework

Abstract This paper argues that the lawful deployment of agentic AI systems requires demonstrated technical and operational capacity to respect jurisdictional legal boundaries. This is a capacity requirement, not a moral claim. Drawing on binding legal frameworks in Australia, the European Union, and international law, the paper maps existing enforceable duties onto the operational requirements for agentic AI systems. The analysis covers child protection, disability rights, domestic violence and coercive control, privacy, Indigenous data sovereignty, and environmental protection. The paper concludes that flooding markets with AI systems that lack containment capacity is incompatible with existing law, and that kill switches represent standard safety infrastructure analogous to recalls, grounding orders, and emergency stops in other regulated industries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18425530
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deployment Capacity and Juridstictional Boundaries for Agentic AI: A Legal and Ecological Homeostasis Framework

John R. Smith
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Deployment Capacity and Juridstictional Boundaries for Agentic AI: A Legal and Ecological Homeostasis Framework

John R. Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper argues that the lawful deployment of agentic AI systems requires demonstrated technical and operational capacity to respect jurisdictional legal boundaries. This is a capacity requirement, not a moral claim. Drawing on binding legal frameworks in Australia, the European Union, and international law, the paper maps existing enforceable duties onto the operational requirements for agentic AI systems. The analysis covers child protection, disability rights, domestic violence and coercive control, privacy, Indigenous data sovereignty, and environmental protection. The paper concludes that flooding markets with AI systems that lack containment capacity is incompatible with existing law, and that kill switches represent standard safety infrastructure analogous to recalls, grounding orders, and emergency stops in other regulated industries.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.