Impact of Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder on rTMS/iTBS Clinical Outcomes in Major Depression: A Multicenter Registry-Based Observational Study

<b>Background:</b> Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often accompanied by generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), a comorbidity linked to greater illness burden and potentially poorer outcomes. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are established treatments for MDD, yet the impact of comorbid GAD and concomitant medications remains unclear. This study aimed to compare rTMS/iTBS treatment outcomes between patients with MDD with and without comorbid GAD, and to examine the association between concomitant psychotropic medication use, stimulation protocol, and treatment response in a real-world clinical setting. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective observational analysis using registry data from 108 patients (MDD + GAD: <i>n</i> = 36; MDD only: <i>n</i> = 72). Patients received either Left-iTBS or Right-rTMS. Baseline severity, percentage change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores, response, and remission were assessed. Logistic and linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and baseline severity were applied. Sensitivity analyses stratified by stimulation protocol and benzodiazepine (BDZ) use were performed. <b>Results:</b> Baseline severity did not differ between groups. MADRS reduction was numerically lower in the comorbid GAD group (48.3% vs. 52.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.09), whereas HAMD-17 reduction was comparable. Response and remission rates did not differ significantly. Medication use and stimulation protocol did not show statistically significant independent associations with outcomes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed equivalent outcomes between Left-iTBS and Right-rTMS. BDZ users showed a non-significant trend toward lower MADRS improvement and remission. <b>Conclusions:</b> rTMS/iTBS produced substantial clinical improvement and was well tolerated in both patients with MDD and those with MDD comorbid with GAD. Although comorbid anxiety showed a modest tendency to attenuate MADRS score reduction, overall response and remission rates were comparable between groups. Neither concomitant medications nor stimulation protocol significantly affected treatment outcomes, while the potential influence of BDZ exposure warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16020068
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder on rTMS/iTBS Clinical Outcomes in Major Depression: A Multicenter Registry-Based Observational Study

Yoshihiro Noda, Ryota Osawa, Yuya Takeda, Takumi Tsuji et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Impact of Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder on rTMS/iTBS Clinical Outcomes in Major Depression: A Multicenter Registry-Based Observational Study

Yoshihiro Noda, Ryota Osawa, Yuya Takeda, Takumi Tsuji, Ryosuke Kitahata, Keiko Fujita
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often accompanied by generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), a comorbidity linked to greater illness burden and potentially poorer outcomes. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are established treatments for MDD, yet the impact of comorbid GAD and concomitant medications remains unclear. This study aimed to compare rTMS/iTBS treatment outcomes between patients with MDD with and without comorbid GAD, and to examine the association between concomitant psychotropic medication use, stimulation protocol, and treatment response in a real-world clinical setting. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective observational analysis using registry data from 108 patients (MDD + GAD: <i>n</i> = 36; MDD only: <i>n</i> = 72). Patients received either Left-iTBS or Right-rTMS. Baseline severity, percentage change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores, response, and remission were assessed. Logistic and linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and baseline severity were applied. Sensitivity analyses stratified by stimulation protocol and benzodiazepine (BDZ) use were performed. <b>Results:</b> Baseline severity did not differ between groups. MADRS reduction was numerically lower in the comorbid GAD group (48.3% vs. 52.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.09), whereas HAMD-17 reduction was comparable. Response and remission rates did not differ significantly. Medication use and stimulation protocol did not show statistically significant independent associations with outcomes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed equivalent outcomes between Left-iTBS and Right-rTMS. BDZ users showed a non-significant trend toward lower MADRS improvement and remission. <b>Conclusions:</b> rTMS/iTBS produced substantial clinical improvement and was well tolerated in both patients with MDD and those with MDD comorbid with GAD. Although comorbid anxiety showed a modest tendency to attenuate MADRS score reduction, overall response and remission rates were comparable between groups. Neither concomitant medications nor stimulation protocol significantly affected treatment outcomes, while the potential influence of BDZ exposure warrants further investigation.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(2)
Suzuki (Japan) (JP), Sleep Comprehensive Care Clinic Yoyogi (JP), Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic (JP), Mita Hospital (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.