Managing the politics of health data during COVID-19: a comparative institutional analysis

Abstract This article investigates the political dynamics of health statistics during COVID-19, a period marked by intensified reliance on quantitative data. It examines how institutional configurations shaped the governance and politics of pandemic data. Using the concept of ‘statistical systems’, the article presents a comparative typology of formal structures and informal norms for official data production and dissemination, and tests how these influenced data politics during the crisis. Drawing on interviews with health officials and experts in Australia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA, the analysis reveals how technical and political challenges in data use were encountered and addressed. Despite facing similar pressures, countries diverged in managing data-related problems and pursuing structural reforms. The findings demonstrate that institutions critically condition data governance during crises. Efforts to redesign data systems should account for embedded institutional patterns that shape data governance and influence public trust across national contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf100
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing the politics of health data during COVID-19: a comparative institutional analysis

Diego Leiva Van de Maele, Cosmo Howard, Clare Wenham, Jessica Kirk et al.
Science and Public Policy
Census and Population Estimation
article

Managing the politics of health data during COVID-19: a comparative institutional analysis

Diego Leiva Van de Maele, Cosmo Howard, Clare Wenham, Jessica Kirk, Sara E Davies
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the political dynamics of health statistics during COVID-19, a period marked by intensified reliance on quantitative data. It examines how institutional configurations shaped the governance and politics of pandemic data. Using the concept of ‘statistical systems’, the article presents a comparative typology of formal structures and informal norms for official data production and dissemination, and tests how these influenced data politics during the crisis. Drawing on interviews with health officials and experts in Australia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA, the analysis reveals how technical and political challenges in data use were encountered and addressed. Despite facing similar pressures, countries diverged in managing data-related problems and pursuing structural reforms. The findings demonstrate that institutions critically condition data governance during crises. Efforts to redesign data systems should account for embedded institutional patterns that shape data governance and influence public trust across national contexts.

Science and Public Policy
Griffith University (AU), Monash University (AU), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.