An Observational Study Comparing Measures of Spasticity: Brunnstrom and Lance

Abstract Introduction: Motor impairment post-stroke is a feature of the upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS). The Brunnstrom Recovery Staging (BRS) is an accepted measure of its progression. It has limited generalisability and accuracy. This study proposes the Lance Scale (LS) as an alternative. The two measures are then compared. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study compares the LS in comparison to BRS in a cohort of stroke survivors. There were 103 participants. Inclusion criteria were those having a first new middle cerebral artery region ischaemic stroke, hemiplegia, encountered within 3 weeks of the event, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 0–3 and able to obey one-step commands. Exclusion criteria were as follows: tone of MAS 4, spastic dystonia, prior strokes or any concurrent orthopaedic, psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders. Information related to age, gender and affected side was collected along with the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Tone and selective voluntary motor control were assessed at the affected elbow. Values were assigned using both BRS and LS. The two were compared for representativeness of the UMNS. LS differs from BRS in that it accounts for all possible tone variants and links to the ASPECTS. Results: The LS provides a more accurate and detailed representation of clinical findings. In the High ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity did not correlate at all with the BRS (rho = 0.12, P = 0.4). In the intermediate ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity did not correlate with the BRS (rho = −0.04, P = 0.8). In the low ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity most closely correlated with the BRS (rho = −0.4, P = 0.1). Regardless of the ASPECTS subgroup, the LS accurately described each presentation. Conclusion: The Lance score is a more detailed and accurate measure to represent the motor recovery in the UMNS. It can help frame the existing literature, facilitating custom clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_45_25
Primary Topic
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Observational Study Comparing Measures of Spasticity: Brunnstrom and Lance

Ravi Sankaran, georg gutjahr, Juhika Kaur, Sreerenjini Biju
Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
article

An Observational Study Comparing Measures of Spasticity: Brunnstrom and Lance

Ravi Sankaran, georg gutjahr, Juhika Kaur, Sreerenjini Biju
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Motor impairment post-stroke is a feature of the upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS). The Brunnstrom Recovery Staging (BRS) is an accepted measure of its progression. It has limited generalisability and accuracy. This study proposes the Lance Scale (LS) as an alternative. The two measures are then compared. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study compares the LS in comparison to BRS in a cohort of stroke survivors. There were 103 participants. Inclusion criteria were those having a first new middle cerebral artery region ischaemic stroke, hemiplegia, encountered within 3 weeks of the event, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 0–3 and able to obey one-step commands. Exclusion criteria were as follows: tone of MAS 4, spastic dystonia, prior strokes or any concurrent orthopaedic, psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders. Information related to age, gender and affected side was collected along with the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Tone and selective voluntary motor control were assessed at the affected elbow. Values were assigned using both BRS and LS. The two were compared for representativeness of the UMNS. LS differs from BRS in that it accounts for all possible tone variants and links to the ASPECTS. Results: The LS provides a more accurate and detailed representation of clinical findings. In the High ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity did not correlate at all with the BRS (rho = 0.12, P = 0.4). In the intermediate ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity did not correlate with the BRS (rho = −0.04, P = 0.8). In the low ASPECTS group, the onset of spasticity most closely correlated with the BRS (rho = −0.4, P = 0.1). Regardless of the ASPECTS subgroup, the LS accurately described each presentation. Conclusion: The Lance score is a more detailed and accurate measure to represent the motor recovery in the UMNS. It can help frame the existing literature, facilitating custom clinical decision-making.

Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.