Unveiling Vertebrate Biodiversity in Arid and Semi‐Arid Terrestrial Ecosystems Through <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding at Savanna Waterholes

Applying environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to samples from waterholes and their surroundings offers a promising approach for monitoring terrestrial vertebrates in semi-arid and arid ecosystems, such as the southern African savannas. However, minimal guidance exists on key sampling design parameters for terrestrial ecosystems, which can significantly influence species detection. This study investigated the effects of sampled substrate, sampling season, and metabarcoding primer pair on species richness and taxonomic group detection in terrestrial vertebrates, with a focus on mammals, using eDNA samples from waterholes in Botsalano Game Reserve, South Africa. A total of 725 eDNA samples were collected from 94 sampling events across wet and dry seasons, detecting 95 species (45 birds, 42 mammals, 4 amphibians, 3 reptiles, and 1 fish). Sediment samples provided more reliable detection of abundant taxa, whereas water samples had higher detection frequencies of rare taxa. A mixed sampling approach yielded the highest species richness. Sampling during the wet season yielded higher species richness overall, while more mammal species were detected from dry season sampling. Overlap in species detection between the two metabarcoding primers tested was low (47%). We formulate recommendations for future eDNA metabarcoding study designs in similar systems, including remote sampling logistics and discuss potential sources of false positives in eDNA metabarcoding, including (1) secondary eDNA input, (2) incomplete genetic reference databases, and (3) the low genetic resolution of metabarcoding markers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolutionary Applications
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70200
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling Vertebrate Biodiversity in Arid and Semi‐Arid Terrestrial Ecosystems Through eDNA Metabarcoding at Savanna Waterholes

Monica Mwale, J. R. Baxter, Tamara Schenekar, Irmgard Sedlmayr et al.
Evolutionary Applications
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Unveiling Vertebrate Biodiversity in Arid and Semi‐Arid Terrestrial Ecosystems Through eDNA Metabarcoding at Savanna Waterholes

Monica Mwale, J. R. Baxter, Tamara Schenekar, Irmgard Sedlmayr, Sibusiso Mahlangu, Julia Gladitsch
article en

Abstract

Applying environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to samples from waterholes and their surroundings offers a promising approach for monitoring terrestrial vertebrates in semi-arid and arid ecosystems, such as the southern African savannas. However, minimal guidance exists on key sampling design parameters for terrestrial ecosystems, which can significantly influence species detection. This study investigated the effects of sampled substrate, sampling season, and metabarcoding primer pair on species richness and taxonomic group detection in terrestrial vertebrates, with a focus on mammals, using eDNA samples from waterholes in Botsalano Game Reserve, South Africa. A total of 725 eDNA samples were collected from 94 sampling events across wet and dry seasons, detecting 95 species (45 birds, 42 mammals, 4 amphibians, 3 reptiles, and 1 fish). Sediment samples provided more reliable detection of abundant taxa, whereas water samples had higher detection frequencies of rare taxa. A mixed sampling approach yielded the highest species richness. Sampling during the wet season yielded higher species richness overall, while more mammal species were detected from dry season sampling. Overlap in species detection between the two metabarcoding primers tested was low (47%). We formulate recommendations for future eDNA metabarcoding study designs in similar systems, including remote sampling logistics and discuss potential sources of false positives in eDNA metabarcoding, including (1) secondary eDNA input, (2) incomplete genetic reference databases, and (3) the low genetic resolution of metabarcoding markers.

Evolutionary ApplicationsVol. 19(2)
University of Graz (AT), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), National Zoological Gardens of South Africa (ZA), South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (ZA)
Austrian Science Fund, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.