Revisiting Acalypha medicinal interest: ethnobotany, experimental studies, and the implications of taxonomic misuse pitfalls

<i>Acalypha</i> L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a pantropical genus comprising approximately 470 species, many of which have been traditionally used to treat human and animal ailments. Despite its widespread use, the interpretation of ethnobotanical information has been hindered by misidentifications, outdated or incorrect names, and the lack of studies for many species - factors that limit its value for pharmacological research and conservation. Previous efforts to synthesise medicinal knowledge in <i>Acalypha</i> have been constrained by limited taxonomic coverage, inconsistent methodologies, and narrow geographic scope. In this study, a comprehensive global review of medicinal uses in <i>Acalypha</i> was conducted, based on data retrieved from peer-reviewed literature, scientific databases, historical sources, and other publications. A total of 62 species with reported uses across 55 countries were identified. Uses include applications in human and veterinary medicine, rituals, and as pesticides, while experimental studies reported antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects. Reported uses were classified as ethnobotanical and/or experimental (<i>in vitro</i>, <i>in vivo</i>, and <i>ex vivo</i>) and standardised following WHO and national disease classification systems, and all scientific names were taxonomically verified. The phylogenetic distribution of medicinal species was assessed using DNA barcode phylogenies. Nearly 25% of the studies reviewed were found to contain at least one taxonomic error, rendering the associated information unreliable and underscoring the need for improved taxonomic rigour and standardisation. This review provides the first standardised, taxonomically validated global synthesis of <i>Acalypha</i>'s medicinal knowledge, identifies major knowledge gaps, and offers a foundation for future phytochemical and pharmacological research on this diverse genus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PhytoKeys
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.270.169087
Primary Topic
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Acalypha medicinal interest: ethnobotany, experimental studies, and the implications of taxonomic misuse pitfalls

Iris Montero‐Muñoz, Pablo Muñoz‐Rodríguez, Lucía Villaescusa-González, JOSÉ MARÍA CARDIEL
PhytoKeys
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
article

Revisiting Acalypha medicinal interest: ethnobotany, experimental studies, and the implications of taxonomic misuse pitfalls

Iris Montero‐Muñoz, Pablo Muñoz‐Rodríguez, Lucía Villaescusa-González, JOSÉ MARÍA CARDIEL
article en

Abstract

<i>Acalypha</i> L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a pantropical genus comprising approximately 470 species, many of which have been traditionally used to treat human and animal ailments. Despite its widespread use, the interpretation of ethnobotanical information has been hindered by misidentifications, outdated or incorrect names, and the lack of studies for many species - factors that limit its value for pharmacological research and conservation. Previous efforts to synthesise medicinal knowledge in <i>Acalypha</i> have been constrained by limited taxonomic coverage, inconsistent methodologies, and narrow geographic scope. In this study, a comprehensive global review of medicinal uses in <i>Acalypha</i> was conducted, based on data retrieved from peer-reviewed literature, scientific databases, historical sources, and other publications. A total of 62 species with reported uses across 55 countries were identified. Uses include applications in human and veterinary medicine, rituals, and as pesticides, while experimental studies reported antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects. Reported uses were classified as ethnobotanical and/or experimental (<i>in vitro</i>, <i>in vivo</i>, and <i>ex vivo</i>) and standardised following WHO and national disease classification systems, and all scientific names were taxonomically verified. The phylogenetic distribution of medicinal species was assessed using DNA barcode phylogenies. Nearly 25% of the studies reviewed were found to contain at least one taxonomic error, rendering the associated information unreliable and underscoring the need for improved taxonomic rigour and standardisation. This review provides the first standardised, taxonomically validated global synthesis of <i>Acalypha</i>'s medicinal knowledge, identifies major knowledge gaps, and offers a foundation for future phytochemical and pharmacological research on this diverse genus.

PhytoKeysVol. 270
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.