Pediatric Gastrostomy Educational Materials: A Health Literacy Assessment

Health literacy and language impact comprehension of and adherence to written educational materials, including those for gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes). Our objective was to evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, content, and language availability of a national sample of written g-tube educational materials. We conducted a cross-sectional study of g-tube educational materials from top 20 children's hospitals (US News and World Report) obtained via a systematic online search and provided by the institutions. We assessed material: (1) readability, (2) understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials, (3) content, and (4) language availability. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) reading grade level was 8.3 (1.9). Mean (SD) understandability and actionability scores were 81.6% (12.1%) and 65.9% (23.2%), respectively. Materials covered a mean (SD) of 46.1% (25.3%) of content items; 20% of institutions provided materials in non-English languages. Future research should examine how to improve educational materials for children with g-tubes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pediatrics
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228251415210
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Gastrostomy Educational Materials: A Health Literacy Assessment

Cori Gibson, Andrea K. Morrison, Audrey Uong, Priti Bhansali et al.
Clinical Pediatrics
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Pediatric Gastrostomy Educational Materials: A Health Literacy Assessment

Cori Gibson, Andrea K. Morrison, Audrey Uong, Priti Bhansali, Emily J. Goodwin, Vincent Huynh, Jessica Schnell, H. Shonna Yin, Rudina Kurtaj, Alexander F. Glick
article en

Abstract

Health literacy and language impact comprehension of and adherence to written educational materials, including those for gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes). Our objective was to evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, content, and language availability of a national sample of written g-tube educational materials. We conducted a cross-sectional study of g-tube educational materials from top 20 children's hospitals (US News and World Report) obtained via a systematic online search and provided by the institutions. We assessed material: (1) readability, (2) understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials, (3) content, and (4) language availability. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) reading grade level was 8.3 (1.9). Mean (SD) understandability and actionability scores were 81.6% (12.1%) and 65.9% (23.2%), respectively. Materials covered a mean (SD) of 46.1% (25.3%) of content items; 20% of institutions provided materials in non-English languages. Future research should examine how to improve educational materials for children with g-tubes.

Clinical Pediatrics
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US), Children's Mercy Hospital (US), Children's National (US), New England Disabled Sports (US), Bellevue Hospital Center (US), Children's Hospital at Montefiore (US), Dermatology Specialists (US), New York University (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.