Pediatric Gastrostomy Educational Materials: A Health Literacy Assessment
Health literacy and language impact comprehension of and adherence to written educational materials, including those for gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes). Our objective was to evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, content, and language availability of a national sample of written g-tube educational materials. We conducted a cross-sectional study of g-tube educational materials from top 20 children's hospitals (US News and World Report) obtained via a systematic online search and provided by the institutions. We assessed material: (1) readability, (2) understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials, (3) content, and (4) language availability. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) reading grade level was 8.3 (1.9). Mean (SD) understandability and actionability scores were 81.6% (12.1%) and 65.9% (23.2%), respectively. Materials covered a mean (SD) of 46.1% (25.3%) of content items; 20% of institutions provided materials in non-English languages. Future research should examine how to improve educational materials for children with g-tubes.
Authors
- Cori Gibson
- Andrea K. Morrison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-385X)
- Audrey Uong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-5226)
- Priti Bhansali
- Emily J. Goodwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-1165)
- Vincent Huynh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2003-1106)
- Jessica Schnell
- H. Shonna Yin
- Rudina Kurtaj
- Alexander F. Glick
Institutions
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US)
- Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
- Children's National (US)
- New England Disabled Sports (US)
- Bellevue Hospital Center (US)
- Children's Hospital at Montefiore (US)
- Dermatology Specialists (US)
- New York University (US)
- University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228251415210
- Primary Topic
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00