Comparison of Aflatoxin Contamination and Dietary Exposure From Complementary Foods Among Rural Tanzanian Infants Enrolled in the Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial

Dietary aflatoxins (AF) exposure in early childhood may contribute to growth restriction. The Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial (MMT) was a cluster-randomized trial designed to assess the effect of providing low-AF maize and groundnut flours (intervention) on infant growth compared to those consuming typically available flours (standard of care [SoC]). The SoC serves as a control, representing the normal frequency and concentration ranges of AF in this region. MMT initiated at infant age 6 months and ended at 18 months, with the intervention group receiving low-AF flours monthly throughout. This sub-study served as one check point in the MMT to assess if there was a difference in AF frequency and concentration in high-risk foods between the two arms. At the MMT midpoint (infant age 12 months), infant foods were collected during household visits within 20 pre-selected clusters (10/arm). Maize/groundnut blend and groundnut flours used in the preparation of foods consumed by infants were analyzed for total AFs by ELISA, with 10% confirmed by HPLC. In total 559 foods were sampled; sampling was on one occasion per household. Chi-square test was used to compare categories of AF contamination in infant foods, and an unpaired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare both contamination by arm, and to compare estimates of AF ingestion between arms. In the intervention arm, 23% of groundnut flour and 6% of blended flour samples had AF levels greater than 10 μg/kg, the legal limit in Tanzania, compared to 45% and 43%, respectively, in the SoC (control) arm (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Further, estimated ingestion of AF was lower for the low-AF supplied blended flours (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and groundnut (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Importantly, the extremely high levels of AF ingestion (> 1000 ng/kg bw/day) observed in the SoC arm were absent in the intervention arm. The provision of low-AF flours in the intervention households reduced the frequency and concentrations of AF contamination compared to the SoC, and thus reduced the estimated dietary exposure to infants, at the midpoint of the trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science & Nutrition
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71315
Primary Topic
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Aflatoxin Contamination and Dietary Exposure From Complementary Foods Among Rural Tanzanian Infants Enrolled in the Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial

E. F. Phillips, Rosemary Kayanda, Francis Ngure, Stoltzfus Rj et al.
Food Science & Nutrition
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
article

Comparison of Aflatoxin Contamination and Dietary Exposure From Complementary Foods Among Rural Tanzanian Infants Enrolled in the Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial

E. F. Phillips, Rosemary Kayanda, Francis Ngure, Stoltzfus Rj, Paul C. Turner, Neema Kassim
article en

Abstract

Dietary aflatoxins (AF) exposure in early childhood may contribute to growth restriction. The Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial (MMT) was a cluster-randomized trial designed to assess the effect of providing low-AF maize and groundnut flours (intervention) on infant growth compared to those consuming typically available flours (standard of care [SoC]). The SoC serves as a control, representing the normal frequency and concentration ranges of AF in this region. MMT initiated at infant age 6 months and ended at 18 months, with the intervention group receiving low-AF flours monthly throughout. This sub-study served as one check point in the MMT to assess if there was a difference in AF frequency and concentration in high-risk foods between the two arms. At the MMT midpoint (infant age 12 months), infant foods were collected during household visits within 20 pre-selected clusters (10/arm). Maize/groundnut blend and groundnut flours used in the preparation of foods consumed by infants were analyzed for total AFs by ELISA, with 10% confirmed by HPLC. In total 559 foods were sampled; sampling was on one occasion per household. Chi-square test was used to compare categories of AF contamination in infant foods, and an unpaired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare both contamination by arm, and to compare estimates of AF ingestion between arms. In the intervention arm, 23% of groundnut flour and 6% of blended flour samples had AF levels greater than 10 μg/kg, the legal limit in Tanzania, compared to 45% and 43%, respectively, in the SoC (control) arm (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Further, estimated ingestion of AF was lower for the low-AF supplied blended flours (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and groundnut (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Importantly, the extremely high levels of AF ingestion (> 1000 ng/kg bw/day) observed in the SoC arm were absent in the intervention arm. The provision of low-AF flours in the intervention households reduced the frequency and concentrations of AF contamination compared to the SoC, and thus reduced the estimated dietary exposure to infants, at the midpoint of the trial.

Food Science & NutritionVol. 14(2)
Goshen College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cornell University (US), University of Arusha (TZ), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (TZ)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.