Associations Between Cognitive Risk Scores and Objective Cognition by Sexual Orientation: Evidence From the CLSA

This study investigated differences in cognitive risk and objective cognitive performance between lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB; <i>n</i> = 309) and heterosexual (<i>n</i> = 16,207) older adults using baseline data (2011-2015) from the Comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Cognitive risk was assessed using the Australian National University - Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI). Cognitive performance was measured using a composite score based on performance on six cognitive tests. The analytic strategy included a combination of t-tests, chi-square tests, and linear regression models. Contrary to expectations, LGB participants exhibited lower cognitive risk scores (M = -1.08, SD = 8.85) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 0.61, SD = 10.62). On subcomponents of the ANU-ADRI score, LGB participants reported higher rates of depression and smoking, and lower social engagement. In terms of cognitive performance, LGB participants scored significantly higher (M = 104.58, SD = 14.72) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 100.12, SD = 15.05). This difference remained even after controlling for ANU-ADRI score, race, and income. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating sociodemographic characteristics into cognitive risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Aging
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275261417696
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Cognitive Risk Scores and Objective Cognition by Sexual Orientation: Evidence From the CLSA

Alexandra Grady, Arne Stinchcombe
Research on Aging
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Associations Between Cognitive Risk Scores and Objective Cognition by Sexual Orientation: Evidence From the CLSA

Alexandra Grady, Arne Stinchcombe
article en

Abstract

This study investigated differences in cognitive risk and objective cognitive performance between lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB; <i>n</i> = 309) and heterosexual (<i>n</i> = 16,207) older adults using baseline data (2011-2015) from the Comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Cognitive risk was assessed using the Australian National University - Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI). Cognitive performance was measured using a composite score based on performance on six cognitive tests. The analytic strategy included a combination of t-tests, chi-square tests, and linear regression models. Contrary to expectations, LGB participants exhibited lower cognitive risk scores (M = -1.08, SD = 8.85) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 0.61, SD = 10.62). On subcomponents of the ANU-ADRI score, LGB participants reported higher rates of depression and smoking, and lower social engagement. In terms of cognitive performance, LGB participants scored significantly higher (M = 104.58, SD = 14.72) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 100.12, SD = 15.05). This difference remained even after controlling for ANU-ADRI score, race, and income. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating sociodemographic characteristics into cognitive risk assessments.

Research on Aging
University of Ottawa (CA), Bruyère (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.