Accretion History of AGNs: A Multiwavelength Comparison of X-Ray- and Infrared-selected AGNs

Abstract Identifying active galactic nuclei (AGNs) using only one wavelength region may miss AGNs with characteristics unfavorable for the identification method, which introduces bias in the sample. To better understand these selection effects, we compare the multiwavelength properties of 2584 X-ray- and IR-selected AGNs at z &lt; 3 in the COSMOS field. The X-ray-selected sample consists of the 2219 AGNs with intrinsic 0.5–10 keV X-ray luminosity greater than 10 43 erg s −1 ; the 993 IR-selected AGNs are identified by their high-contrast, power-law IR colors using Spitzer/IRAC observations. We find that both selection methods miss a significant fraction of AGNs, as only 24.3% of AGNs (628 out of the total of 2584 AGNs) are recovered by both selection criteria. X-ray selection can capture the most diverse range of multiwavelength spectral emission features, while IRAC selection is biased against AGNs with a steeply decreasing power flux ( λF λ ) between 1 and 6 μ m. For AGNs with X-ray detections, IRAC-selected sources are 2.5× more X-ray luminous than AGNs not identified by their IR colors. IRAC-selected AGNs without detectable X-rays are obscured, as they have a mean X-ray correction factor <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">int</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:math> −1.4; 28.5%–42.2% of these AGNs are Compton-thick (according to estimated column densities). Only 1.4% of X-ray-selected AGNs are Compton-thick. The AGN selection technique used significantly impacts the overall characteristics of the resulting AGN sample.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae2a32
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accretion History of AGNs: A Multiwavelength Comparison of X-Ray- and Infrared-selected AGNs

Christopher M. Carroll, Connor Auge, Meredith C. Powell, Tonima Tasnim Ananna et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Accretion History of AGNs: A Multiwavelength Comparison of X-Ray- and Infrared-selected AGNs

Christopher M. Carroll, Connor Auge, Meredith C. Powell, Tonima Tasnim Ananna, Ryan C. Hickox, T. Weaver, Traceye Jan Turner, Allison Kirkpatrick, Alessandro Peca, Mislav Baloković, Greg Troiani, Médéric Boquien, Michael Koss, Brandon Coleman, Ezequiel Treister, C. Megan Urry, Stefano Marchesi, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, David Sanders, Thresa Kelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Identifying active galactic nuclei (AGNs) using only one wavelength region may miss AGNs with characteristics unfavorable for the identification method, which introduces bias in the sample. To better understand these selection effects, we compare the multiwavelength properties of 2584 X-ray- and IR-selected AGNs at z &lt; 3 in the COSMOS field. The X-ray-selected sample consists of the 2219 AGNs with intrinsic 0.5–10 keV X-ray luminosity greater than 10 43 erg s −1 ; the 993 IR-selected AGNs are identified by their high-contrast, power-law IR colors using Spitzer/IRAC observations. We find that both selection methods miss a significant fraction of AGNs, as only 24.3% of AGNs (628 out of the total of 2584 AGNs) are recovered by both selection criteria. X-ray selection can capture the most diverse range of multiwavelength spectral emission features, while IRAC selection is biased against AGNs with a steeply decreasing power flux ( λF λ ) between 1 and 6 μ m. For AGNs with X-ray detections, IRAC-selected sources are 2.5× more X-ray luminous than AGNs not identified by their IR colors. IRAC-selected AGNs without detectable X-rays are obscured, as they have a mean X-ray correction factor <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">int</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:math> −1.4; 28.5%–42.2% of these AGNs are Compton-thick (according to estimated column densities). Only 1.4% of X-ray-selected AGNs are Compton-thick. The AGN selection technique used significantly impacts the overall characteristics of the resulting AGN sample.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 997(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.