Cost-effective routine pharmaceutical testing using radial flow stream splitting HPLC columns: Quantitative analysis and performance metrics in the analysis of over-the-counter drugs

The demand for rapid and reliable analytical methods in the pharmaceutical industry continues to grow, with Ultra-/High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (U/HPLC) remaining the gold standard for impurity profiling, quantification of active pharmaceutical ingredients, and degradation product analysis. However, traditional HPLC methods are often constrained by pressure limitations at higher flow rates, which can hinder analytical throughput. While recent advancements in column technology have improved performance, they typically exacerbate pressure-related challenges. In this study, we evaluate a novel column technology designed to address these limitations by enabling high-resolution separations at reduced pressures and increased flow rates. Our findings demonstrate that the column, when operated in Radial Flow Stream Splitting (RFS) mode, maintains quantitative accuracy and repeatability while achieving up to a 120 % improvement in separation efficiency and a 30 % reduction in backpressure compared to conventional operation. By way of assaying over-the-counter medication, we have found no difference in the quantitative reliability of the assay when in RFS vs stock mode, despite reducing the analysis time by up to 40 %.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2026.117386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effective routine pharmaceutical testing using radial flow stream splitting HPLC columns: Quantitative analysis and performance metrics in the analysis of over-the-counter drugs

Jake A. Cravino, Christopher E. Karlsen, F. Li, R. Andrew Shalliker et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
16.26
article

Cost-effective routine pharmaceutical testing using radial flow stream splitting HPLC columns: Quantitative analysis and performance metrics in the analysis of over-the-counter drugs

Jake A. Cravino, Christopher E. Karlsen, F. Li, R. Andrew Shalliker, Michalina McDermott, Zachary Sargeant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The demand for rapid and reliable analytical methods in the pharmaceutical industry continues to grow, with Ultra-/High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (U/HPLC) remaining the gold standard for impurity profiling, quantification of active pharmaceutical ingredients, and degradation product analysis. However, traditional HPLC methods are often constrained by pressure limitations at higher flow rates, which can hinder analytical throughput. While recent advancements in column technology have improved performance, they typically exacerbate pressure-related challenges. In this study, we evaluate a novel column technology designed to address these limitations by enabling high-resolution separations at reduced pressures and increased flow rates. Our findings demonstrate that the column, when operated in Radial Flow Stream Splitting (RFS) mode, maintains quantitative accuracy and repeatability while achieving up to a 120 % improvement in separation efficiency and a 30 % reduction in backpressure compared to conventional operation. By way of assaying over-the-counter medication, we have found no difference in the quantitative reliability of the assay when in RFS vs stock mode, despite reducing the analysis time by up to 40 %.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisVol. 273
Sustainability Institute (ZA), Western Sydney University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
16.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.